• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

Have the BCT-15 sensitivity been tested yet?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bwigg

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Messages
79
I was wondering if anybody has tested the sensitivity of the new BCT-15 with a service monitor yet?

I am holding off on the purchase of one until someone can verify it's not deaf like the BCD396T. After I purchased the BCD396T, I had get a PRO-96 just so I could continue to monitor my areas VHF and VHF airband comms. I can understand there must be a balance between overall senstivity vs intermod/overload but the PRO-96 hears receives fringe comms much better.

The new unit has lots of good features and looks good, but if it doesn't have good sensitivity it will be useless in my application.

How about intermod rejection and front end overload? I have a PRO-2055 that works very well, but I had to add a notch cavity tuned to 152.480mhz, a 3 db pad and a FM notch filter just to get rid of all the pager crap and front end overload.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
1,224
Location
PNW
My Pro-2054 has similar problems with paging and intermod in my RF hell location.

So far no problem with the BCT-15.
 

bwigg

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Messages
79
oregontreehugger said:
My Pro-2054 has similar problems with paging and intermod in my RF hell location.

So far no problem with the BCT-15.
That sounds good! I am in a RF hell location also. No scanner has ever worked without filters inline. The only radio I have that is immune to intermod is my VHF Astro Saber. It has no problems even with all my filters removed.

I may have to take the plunge when I can get some real sensitivity specs on the unit.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
1,224
Location
PNW
FWIW, the published specs are in the back of the BCT-15 operating manual. Here's a cut-and-paste of the manual specs:

Sensitivity (nominal) 12dB SINAD:
0.4μV 25 - 27.995 MHz AM
0.3μV 28 - 53.98 MHz NFM
0.7μV 54 - 71.95 MHz WFM
0.3μV 72 - 75.995 MHz FM
0.6μV 76 - 107.9 MHz WFM/FMB
0.4μV 108 - 136.975 MHz AM
0.3μV 137 - 173.9875 MHz NFM
0.6μV 174 - 215.95 MHz WFM
0.3μV 216 - 224.98 MHz NFM
0.4μV 225 - 379.975 MHz AM
0.4μV 380 - 512 MHz NFM
0.3μV 764 - 954 MHz NFM
0.7μV 1240 - 1300 MHz NFM

Interestingly, I get some router and computer interference on the BCT-15, but much less paging interference. With the Pro-2054 I get less router and computer interference, but more paging interference. Oh well, can't win everytime!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top