• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

How does simulcast work?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kazzaw

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
350
Location
South East QLD, Australia
I'm looking for detailed information on how simulcast sites work - How does the subscriber radio know (or not know) which site its talking to? How do the sites know which subscriber radio is talking to it?
 

tweiss3

Is it time for Coffee?
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
1,210
Location
Ohio
I'm looking for detailed information on how simulcast sites work - How does the subscriber radio know (or not know) which site its talking to? How do the sites know which subscriber radio is talking to it?
That's the benefit of simulcast, it doesn't know or care which tower it is using. They system measures for the best received connection through a voter, and uses that for the received signal from the subscriber. All the transmitters are all time synced and transmit the exact same thing at the same time, so the subscriber doesn't know or care that it may be receiving from 1 or multiple sites. FM capture effect also plays a part.
 

chief21

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
1,865
Location
Summer - Western NC; Winter - Tampa Bay FL
That's the benefit of simulcast, it doesn't know or care which tower it is using. They system measures for the best received connection through a voter, and uses that for the received signal from the subscriber. All the transmitters are all time synced and transmit the exact same thing at the same time, so the subscriber doesn't know or care that it may be receiving from 1 or multiple sites. FM capture effect also plays a part.
One of the best definitions of simulcast I've heard. (y)(y)
 

Kazzaw

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
350
Location
South East QLD, Australia
All the transmitters are all time synced and transmit the exact same thing at the same time, so the subscriber doesn't know or care that it may be receiving from 1 or multiple sites. FM capture effect also plays a part.
Thanks. The reason I ask is I was having a convo with a mate regarding time sync and how they work - obviously through GPS. Obviously there is something that 'delays' the transmission from each site, and the communications between site is fibre at a guess?

I've seen simulcast sites locally and all have a GPS antenna, I assume these all talk together between the simulcast sites through an IP connection, and delay the repeater TX so they all TX the same thing at the same time?
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,288
Location
United States
Thanks. The reason I ask is I was having a convo with a mate regarding time sync and how they work - obviously through GPS. Obviously there is something that 'delays' the transmission from each site, and the communications between site is fibre at a guess?

Backhaul between radio sites can be fiber, microwave, telco, or IP.

I've seen simulcast sites locally and all have a GPS antenna, I assume these all talk together between the simulcast sites through an IP connection, and delay the repeater TX so they all TX the same thing at the same time?

Correct.
Frequency accuracy of the transmitted signal is super important, and GPS disciplined oscillators are used to keep the transmitters on frequency.
The GPS also is used as a reference for time. On IP based simulcast systems, the system will figure out the network delay and adjust accordingly.
 

tweiss3

Is it time for Coffee?
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
1,210
Location
Ohio
Thanks. The reason I ask is I was having a convo with a mate regarding time sync and how they work - obviously through GPS. Obviously there is something that 'delays' the transmission from each site, and the communications between site is fibre at a guess?

I've seen simulcast sites locally and all have a GPS antenna, I assume these all talk together between the simulcast sites through an IP connection, and delay the repeater TX so they all TX the same thing at the same time?
More or less, yes, GPS is used for the time synchronization, and design/testing in field determines delay. Connection between sites can be done many different ways.

Just saw @mmckenna said the same thing above.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,451
Location
Pittsboro IN
We worked at a PSAP that had a cable modem IP feed to a simulcast paging site where the others were RF links. They design engineer could not get enough delay in the RF sites to match the time it took for the IP site to get the data. I think they had it set on a delay so the others were done before it keyed.
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,698
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
The audio time sync isn't that critical as it can be 50mS-100mS off and still sound good. What's important are that the RF frequency are exact in frequency, but then if a vehicle travel at speed from one site towards another the doppler effect will screw that up, so simulcast will always be problematic with users that move around and are not stationary. Technology evolves so I don't know what the tolerances are but perhaps it is now taken care of in portables and mobiles at normal speeds at 55mph.

/Ubbe
 

Signal3and2

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 3, 2005
Messages
96
Location
WY
In many cases, sites in a simulcast cell are frequency offset from each other by a few hertz, which makes that GPS reference even more important. This minimizes TDI in overlapping coverage areas and helps the radio "pick out" it's best signal. That's an oversimplification, but true regardless.
 

freddaniel

Member
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
126
Location
Newport Beach, CA
I would like to add that a fairly new IP based analog FM Simulcast standard is evolving from the original design of the late Jim Dixon called AllStar and is available at www.AllStarLink.org on the web. There are hundreds of systems in service from simple one Tx site with several voting receivers to 5 or 10 site full simulcast. Also see www.allstarsimulcast.com by Joe Moskalski, KC2IRV who operates a 6 site system. There is also a Wiki with tons of useful information.
In addition, it is not necessary to always use high sites, as they tend to create excessive overlap, which is where timing issues really expose any faults. By using earth blockage, using ground level sites, a better simulcast can be created.

Hardware is readily available to use with MTR2000 or Quantars.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top