• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

How to choose??

fasteddy64

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Messages
765
Reaction score
258
Location
Gulfport, MS
Ok, the choices are overwhelming!
How do I choose a radio?
I want a HT that covers as many frequencies and modes as possible.
Must do MW, SW, SSB, and as much of the VHF/UHF spectrum as possible.

Quansheng? Tidradio? Radtel? Iradio? Others?
I dont care about APRS/GPS

What are your suggestions?
Ed
KG5UN
 

dlwtrunked

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,669
Reaction score
1,530
Ok, the choices are overwhelming!
How do I choose a radio?
I want a HT that covers as many frequencies and modes as possible.
Must do MW, SW, SSB, and as much of the VHF/UHF spectrum as possible.

Quansheng? Tidradio? Radtel? Iradio? Others?
I dont care about APRS/GPS

What are your suggestions?
Ed
KG5UN
The HTs will not do HF or with extremely poor transmit performance and for anyone with any real experience inadequate receive performance. No transceiver will give you a full range of digital modes. You will need to back off on your expectations to looking at the radios and deciding what you want rather that defining what you want and look at the radios.
 

fasteddy64

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Messages
765
Reaction score
258
Location
Gulfport, MS
The HTs will not do HF or with extremely poor transmit performance and for anyone with any real experience inadequate receive performance. No transceiver will give you a full range of digital modes. You will need to back off on your expectations to looking at the radios and deciding what you want rather that defining what you want and look at the radios.
I dont want any digital modes.
I dont want it to transmit on HF. Just looking for a fairly decent receiver with a broad range of frequencies.
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,151
Reaction score
2,152
Location
Southwest, IL
In your OP you mention an HT and list several cheap brands.

Then you mention not transmitting on HF but looking for a receiver. What exactly are you looking for ?
 

fasteddy64

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Messages
765
Reaction score
258
Location
Gulfport, MS
In your OP you mention an HT and list several cheap brands.

Then you mention not transmitting on HF but looking for a receiver. What exactly are you looking for ?
I am looking at these different cheap Chinese HT's.
They transmit on VHF and UHF ham bands.
They have wide range receivers covering AM broadcast up through UHF, some up to 900 mhz or more.
I would like to listen to amateur, public safety, marine and aircraft coms (VHF and UHF)
I am not interested in any of the digital modes (DMR, C4FM, Dstar etc...)
I am not interested in APRS or GPS
I am not interested in Transmitting on HF
I do want to receive multiple modes, AM, FM, WFM and SSB.

Some examples I have looked at are the Quansheng TK-11, The Tid Radio H3, H8, Radtel 880, 920, Iradio UV-88. Just to name a few.
I just thought this was a good forum to ask for opinions from others who might be using some of these radios.
 

EAFrizzle

Bond. Ward Bond
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
1,426
Location
SE de DFW
Right now, I'm using the Radtel RT-860, RT-880, and RT-950 Pro, and they're all very capable as receivers for HF through 900. Right now, the 880 and the 950 are within a couple of bucks of each other, so I'd recommend the 950, as it does well with all my antennas on HF, while the 880 and 860 seem to prefer an active or amplified signal.

One thing to consider between the 950 and the 880 & 860 is the antenna jacks. There's pros and cons to both setups. The 950's single SMA is convenient (and you don't have to worry about losing the cover knob), but for monitoring at the desk, the dual-SMA split between the transceiver and the HF/FM receiver is easier for me to change antennas as needed.

I use mine mostly for military and civil aviation listening; being able to monitor HF and three V/U frequencies simultaneously is pretty cool. SSB reception is much better than you'd expect from an HT. While all three models have SSB in the HF section, only the 860 has SSB receive in the transceiver section, if you're interested in 6m and 2m sideband activity. The 860 only has two VFOs compared to three on the 880 and 950.

Regarding the VFOs on the 950 and 880, you assign a working band to the VFOs (18-64 MHz, 64-620 MHz, etc.) The 880 has 3 working bands that can be assigned independently to each VFO. The 950 has two working bands; whichever one is selected is applied to all 3 VFOs. This can be defeated in both by booting into wideband receive mode/test mode on the 880 and 950 respectively, with the loss of transmit and some monitoring functions.

Battery life is good on the 880 and 860, and even better on the 950. Listening to shortwave broadcasts, I got tired of having the 950 on after close to 14 hours and the battery indicator showed about ¼ to ⅓ charge left.

As transceivers, they're nice and clean on transmit in 2m and 70 and 33cm, with appropriate power outputs. I haven't checked mine on 10-15 meters or 6 & 1.25m, but I've seen reports all over the place.

Medium Wave is OK on all of them, but not what I'd call a DX machine. Audio is crisp with a nice contour. The 860 comes out on top, as it's speaker doesn't share space with the keypad. All three have a good, solid feel in the hand with metal chassis, nothing like the plastic toy feel of the Baofeng UV-5R. They get progressively larger with the 860 a similar size to a Baofeng 5RM and the 950 similar to a Uniden SDS100.

A quick search shows the 860 from $35-45, the 880 for $50-70, and the 950 for around $75. I enjoy all three of mine; they're an amazing amount of spectrum in the palm of your hand without breaking the bank.

For all-around use, the 950 wins; a telescopic whip gives you HF through UHF with good reception and easy portability. In the shack, you might prefer the dual-antenna setup of the 880 or 860, especially if you already have a good selection available.

Good luck in your hunt!
 
Last edited:

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,525
Reaction score
33,484
Location
United States
Some examples I have looked at are the Quansheng TK-11, The Tid Radio H3, H8, Radtel 880, 920, Iradio UV-88. Just to name a few.
I just thought this was a good forum to ask for opinions from others who might be using some of these radios.

I have used none of those radios. I tend to avoid the Chinese stuff. I'm sure you'll find lots of supporters here that will recommend one, some or all of those.

I would like to listen to amateur, public safety, marine and aircraft coms (VHF and UHF)
I am not interested in any of the digital modes (DMR, C4FM, Dstar etc...)
I am not interested in APRS or GPS
I am not interested in Transmitting on HF
I do want to receive multiple modes, AM, FM, WFM and SSB.

One radio that does everything usually does nothing well.

From what you describe, you'll likely have a better experience with a dedicated scanner for the VHF/UHF stuff and a separate shortwave radio for the shortwave stuff.

You can get basic analog only scanners that will cover the VHF and UHF bands, as well as aircraft, and actually do it well. Nice thing about them is that they have features that the Chinese transceivers won't. They'll scan faster, search for unknown frequencies, and do a lot more.

On the shortwave side, there's also a lot of good options.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,876
Reaction score
13,389
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I've used the Quansheng with modded firmware and a Tidradio, both will receive some of the HF band like 20m and up but not the entire band. They do work but its more of a gimmick than something you would use on a regular basis. Maybe if you were on a backpacking trip and could only take one lightweight radio for everything, then the amusement of hearing some HF might be ok, otherwise I would not reach for my Quansheng for any serious listening. You would also need an appropriate HF antenna to make it work and you wont hear any HF on the supplied whip.

On VHF and UHF the Quansheng and especially the Tidradio work ok and I have no complaints for the price. I have many real expensive HTs laying around here and when I go out for a walk or a short drive I grab my Tidradio and not the expensive stuff.
 

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,666
Reaction score
2,600
Location
California
Same here with the TID H3 for VHF/UHF. I even carry it more often than my tiny Yaesu VX-3R. Not as small, but close.

@fasteddy64 - Based on your request, you should look at the Kenwood D75A. Also, your post is in the budget transceiver section, but I’m getting the vibe you just want to listen. While the Kenwood D75A and the earlier D74A handhelds will do what you want, as well as transmit, I recommend you research and purchase an Icom R30 handheld receiver. It is purpose built receiver for what you want and the selectivity as well as sensitivity are better than my D74A. I compared them side by side during testing and the Icom R30 is superior.

Problem: The Icom R30 was discontinued…and sellers want a lot of money even for used.
 
Top