Junior1970 said:
That nightmare is curently happening now. However it concerns Wendover, UT/ West Wendover, NV. Two cities, two police departments, two fire departments, two states. UT is on 800 Mhz, NV is VHF. There was/is talk of NV moving the border two miles east to absorb the Utah town but NV doesnt want to absorb the towns debt. Plus any change of states borders requires a literal act of congress to occur plus common consensus of both states. Lots of bureaucatic red tape for this to occur. Now I know that:
a) this has little to do with scanning and
b) has nothing to do with AZ but....
Exsmokey brings up a good point but realistically how many agencies around the country have this same problem. Border cities governed by two separate states using two totally incompatible systems. In this case AZ on UHF, NV on 800 and UT on VHF?
Something to think about!
I'm somewhat familiar with the Wendover situation as I watch KOLO, the ABC affiliate in Reno and they have done occassional stories on Wendover. Another situation similar is Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas. One of the best examples of this is Point Roberts, Washington, a small end point on a peninsula the majority of which is in British Columbia. There are some others but as they are in the east and "mid West" (for me everything east of Denver International is the east) I don't comment as I don't know them all that well. In the case of Littlefiled, AZ and Point Roberts, Washington terrain really cuts these areas off from the political jurisdiction they are in. But the point remains that many political jurisdictions have to maintain infastructure in an inefficient way for locations that, from a cultural and issue persceptive, are really in another jurisdiction.
What does this have to do with scanning? You have agencies we listen to on the radio affected by this issue. In the case of law enforcement you have officers whose daily duties have to face this issue. How close is backup for a Mohave County deputy sheriff and an AZ DPS officer. How do they communicate with their closest backup, which could be from either one of two other states? How do they communicate in these cases? Interoperability is largely an issue for disasters in many areas of the country, but for these officers it is an issue of importance during their entire shifts.
I just looked in the Southern Nevada Radio Scanner Book, 3rd edition, and did not see a patch talkgroup on the NSRS for the Arizona Highway Patrol or DPS as it is commonly called in Arizona. If DPS officers have VHF-High radios in their vehicles to communicate with the Utah Highway Patrol then perhaps they have Mohave County and Metro Las Vegas frequencies in them. With Utah migrating onto UCAN and Metro awarding a contract for a trunked system this won't be a solution much longer.
Without good communications with the closest backup an officer has to change the critieria for their officer safety red flags. I would think one would have to be extra cautious in those circumstances. I know I was when working remote wilderness locations.