I loved mine, and have helped a few others prolong theirs. It was my first real SDR and blew away what I was using with the Softrock kits. They do have a problem with the EEPROM getting corrupted and aligning the receiver requires a program (ex2099.exe) and conventional equipement, as opposed to adjusting trimmers inside the gear. Also, it was prone to getting damaged by ESD, etc. and would zap the front end of the HF module. I've moved on SDRPlay and Airspy SDR's which blow away the PCR 1k in terms of HF performance. If you can find someone locally who can do the EEPROM alignment, then go for it, it's still great for VHF and above.
My initial test shows this thing is just not right. If I can source the alignment software, that will tell me a lot.
What I see most with the eeprom is saving the machine state through power cycles. That part works.
I think Ubbe mentioned this is not an SDR like today. It is a computer controlled black box receiver. That part true.
Advanced technology for its day, no doubt there are "soft pots" for alighnments.
I do have all the needed bench test equipment and strong background with radio troubleshooting and embedded control.
My point in messing with this is for SWLing below 60 Mhz. My liability there is a sad excuse for an antenna.
I have dozens of radios from air band to 1 Ghz that work. (even RTL-SDR)
The bottom band has the typical little noise then great noise connecting an antenna so presuming the front end works.
There are a few AM BC stations near, but tunning to one, the noise is greater than the signal. not right.
If my RX-888 would work decent, I would use that. HDSDR is awful and spikes and birdies everywhere.
I am at the dismantle point on the bench, so lets see whats up.
73s