• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

increase Sensitivity?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
975
#4
You can get a better antenna, place it in a better location, or focus it towards the transmitting source.

Sorry if i wasnt much help.
 

davidgcet

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
1,250
#5
it has a 12db sinad of .3uV at VHF and .4uV at UHF, any more and it will just be hearing the noise floor anyway on vhf. are you sure you need better sensitivity and not a better antenna?
 
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
975
#6
it has a 12db sinad of .3uV at VHF and .4uV at UHF, any more and it will just be hearing the noise floor anyway on vhf. are you sure you need better sensitivity and not a better antenna?
This has been suggested 3 times now.. maybe the OP needs a new antenna.... ;)
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
27
Location
Iowa, USA
#13
I have upgraded antennas already to a 6" VHF rubber duckie.
I am comparing reception side by side with a base unit/telescopic antenna.
The BC72 does not receive as well even when interchanging antennas from one another.

(scanning VHF band centered around 155 most of the time)
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
27
Location
Iowa, USA
#15
this I already know

a rubber duckie is not going to rx as well as a larger antenna.
correct..... as I just stated in my previous reply

"The BC72 does not receive as well even when interchanging antennas from one another."
as in "base telescopic to VHF aftermarket rubber duck"
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
27
Location
Iowa, USA
#18
ok......... no outdoor antenna already. I already have a base , I got a handheld to be portable.

I just wanted to know if the attenuator could be adjusted or clipped because its receiver performance is lower than my mobiles and bases using the identical antennas on simultaneous bench testing
 

ratboy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
813
Location
Toledo,Ohio
#19
I've seen a couple of these (and quite a number of other Uniden radios) that have unsoldered or badly soldered antenna connections, and a little hit with an iron makes it come alive. I used to find a lot of the older RS scanners, both GRE and Uniden made that were totally out of alignment. One of the Uniden ones received better 5KHZ off freq! I don't know if parts values changed after being "broken in", or it got whacked during shipping. My Pro-2005 was very deaf on VHF until I found the alignment procedure and carefully did it. It really woke it up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top