• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

Is the Uniden bc75xlt any good?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tdenfuny

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
87
#1
If one is only interested in following analog frequencies and maybe only one the order of 20 or so, is there any reason not to get the Uniden bc75xlt over some of the more advanced scanners? I get that the bc75xlt does analog frequencies and that it has more than 20 memory channels that it will scan, but will a more advanced model give anything more in this area?
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
21,675
Location
Bowie, Md.
#2
It greatly depends on where you are, tden. Once we know where you are (county/state is fine), then folks can jump in with more definitive answers than 'maybe'

Mike
 

tdenfuny

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
87
#4
I know where I live and my question isn't about what scanner would be good for my specific location. I know that I only want to listen to about 20 analogue frequencies. And I know that the 75xlt does this, but is there any reason to pick a more advanced model? Will a more advanced model offer better reception on the analogue frequencies? For example, the bc125at will allow you to assign names to each frequencies. But does the 125at receive better?
 

JStemann

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
477
Location
SE Indiana
#5
There probably isn't a significant difference between the performance of the bc75 or bc125 for what you're wanting to use it for. I would say that you may want to look outside scanners if you want to see the best performance. Maybe something from AOR, Icom and Alinco all offer receivers that should perform (sensitivity,selectivity) better than a regular scanner.

Jeff.
 

tdenfuny

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
87
#6
There probably isn't a significant difference between the performance of the bc75 or bc125 for what you're wanting to use it for. I would say that you may want to look outside scanners if you want to see the best performance. Maybe something from AOR, Icom and Alinco all offer receivers that should perform (sensitivity,selectivity) better than a regular scanner.

Jeff.
So something like an icom r6?
 

JStemann

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
477
Location
SE Indiana
#7
I personally prefer something with a full keypad, like the r20, or aor 8200. Unfortunately, the r20 is discontinued and the aor is kind of expensive. Aor has the dj11, that looks pretty decent and has a reasonable price. If you don't mind the limited keypad of the r6, it should do what you want. You can check out the specs on all of them in the link below:

Wideband Receiver Index

Jeff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top