Sometimes Deputies will go to simplex or direct
We called using the repeater output frequency "Channel 1" in my earliest years with the U.S. Forest Service. The repeater was always on Channel 2 in USFS radiios, no matter where you went in the agency. Other agencies called it "car to car". In the 80's as we began to get programmable radios with other agency's frequencies in them, we began to talk on lots of different systems on a frequent basis. It was decided in interagency meetings that everyone had the simplex frequency of their repeaters ouput in a different order, so the USFS method of saying "Channel 1" was not common. The CHP was used to saying "the S channel" or "the C channel" so that really got confusing when they would use the additional channels in their extenders to speak on VHF systems. In addition going simplex on another agency's system meant going to whatever channel it was programmed into your radio and certainly not channel 1. It was decided that saying "car to car" was too lengthy. Many radios were coming out with a switch that said "Direct/Repeater" at that time also. So the word "direct" was chosen and accepted for interoperability purposes.
We got so accustomed with the term we began to stop using the old "Channel 1" label even when talking to each other on our own system. On fires all over the country I heard people from many other areas and agencies start to use "direct" also. In the radio industry the term "simplex" is easily understood, but for the vast majority of users it sounds a bit foreign. Direct and repeater fit logically together and asking the users to say "simplex and duplex" is not realistic. Heck, I'm confused when radio people say duplex as full duplex is transmitting and receiving simultaneously. When using a repeater it is actually "semi-duplex".
If LASO deputies use the term "direct", they are not the only ones!
To my knowledge, LASD has never used voice inversion scrambling
I definitely heard speech inversion being used sometime during the period 1987 to 1992. It was only used on the mobile side and not by the dispatcher. 1987 was about the time the LASO phased out lowband and I don't remember if speech inversion was used on the mobile side of their dispatch channels. I remember programming the BC-760's in my cars and my BC-200 handheld with the mobile frequency of the dispatch channels I was going to listen to when visiting my sister in Acton for family events. I remember slaving over the scanners, programming them before each trip, usually late at night before leaving the next day. I remember my disappointment when all the moibile frequencies sounded like a duck. My carefully thought out programs and painful programming efforts resulted in unusable space being taken up where I had needs for other frequencies. I remember it so well because I was so disappointed my great programs had to be changed and in those days if you inserted a frequency in a bank, you had to reprogram all the other channels in that bank in order to make the change.
I never tried listening to the mobile frequency much at all as I lived anywhere from 350 to 1500 miles from L.A. County during their use of lowband. I heard some great skip from 1979 to 1987 and could always tell when I was receiving them. The dispatchers had the fastest tongues in the west except for Chick Hern's and their words were always followed by the famous beep, beep, beep . . . . . I was visiting LA in the seventies when I came out of a theater someone had driven me to and wondered what jurisdiction we were in (it was a real checkerboard area) when I heard the beeps without seeing the officer. Questioned asked and answered!