It's not clear, to me anyway, from the document I posted if this is going to be an actual part of LCRA P25 system or if it will be separate and LCRA just assisted them with licensing.Good to see they are planning on joining.
Digging in further to the other attachment to the application, LCRA is using WPTZ776 to build Floresville and Stockdale sites, and this license covers West Wilson and LaVernia through the Wilson Co SO. They aim to have it online within three months of licensing. I can confirm nothing is online yet, 700 or 900, after passing through Floresville today.
The true Floresville city site and Stockdale are both using the state license so they won’t show up in the fcc database. The two licensed to Wilson Co SO are the LaVernia site and the West Wilson site which has a Floresville address but in reality is closer to Calaveras Lake.Looks like 138.38 is Floresville and 140.40 is maybe LV or Stockdale. Neither are online but both have been showing as neighbors to Cibolo and Hickory Forrest sites with 140.40 also showing as neighbor to Seguin and Kingsbury sites. DSD showing them as “FAILED, Info Outdated, ISOLATED” since last week.
Also a new neighbor caught my eye on Kingsbury site, 160.60 - 770.71875. No idea where it is. Also 161.1 - 770.71875 is showing up but with the same thing “FAILED, Info Outdated, ISOLATED”.
The true Floresville city site and Stockdale are both using the state license so they won’t show up in the fcc database. The two licensed to Wilson Co SO are the LaVernia site and the West Wilson site which has a Floresville address but in reality is closer to Calaveras Lake.
It is good to know I also have family in Wilson county.Have family in Wilson. Good to see they are planning on joining. The PDs and SO are on separate channels(SO is P25, cities are still analog with old Motorola radios) and the ESDs around the county are barely getting into P25 over the past couple years or so. They must have liked what Guadalupe and Gonzales counties are saying about the LCRA system.
When you locate any of those new WPTZ776 sites, LCRA or 13E, submit to the database. Same goes for additional voice channels or control channel lineup changes. We don’t differentiate between control and secondary control in the database any longer, but if it’s a Moto system and the displayed control channels change, we will have to update the database. LCRA is all Harris infrastructure so all voice channels are also controlGotcha. I have noticed site 1.57, network BEEE09.13E, 774.53125 come up along with 1.58 - 774.78125, same network but not neighbors. Haven’t noticed any TGs or traffic, just broadcasting BSI=WPTZ776. No idea if related.
Also looks like missing 770.15625 and 770.44375 in DB for Seguin site.
When you locate any of those new WPTZ776 sites, LCRA or 13E, submit to the database. Same goes for additional voice channels or control channel lineup changes. We don’t differentiate between control and secondary control in the database any longer, but if it’s a Moto system and the displayed control channels change, we will have to update the database. LCRA is all Harris infrastructure so all voice channels are also control