The op said he was looking for "field expedient that I could throw in my cargo pocket and move out". Stuffing even that micro tuner from MFJ in the pocket of the BDU and letting it beat me in the leg is not my idea of a fun day."
That's hardly a realistic scenario when you're talking about HF. A VHF or UHF HT, maybe but HF? LOL...
I get it. The OP wants small and light. That's doable. Pocketsize, with any chance of working someone, not so much.
He mentioned 20 meters. A single band dipole fed with RG174 might be ok. A 5 watt transmitter feeding a dipole with 35 feet of RG174 would have an ERP of a bit under 4 watts. I used to do backpack camping and took an HW7 with me and used a dipole fed with RG58. It was plenty small and light enough. Worked all over the world with that.
Anything you can come up with that meets his requirements is going to be a compromise.
This is true. But performance doesn't have to be one of the things compromised. There are plenty of successful QRP operators out there, and the secret to their success is paying attention to antenna efficiency and losses. It's relatively easy to get a 4 watt ERP with a 100 watt transmitter. It takes a but if thinking to get a 4 watt ERP with a 5 watt transmitter.
Yes the RG-174 is a compromise. It serves two purposes. It attenuates the reflected power as mentioned.[/quote]
As well as the forward power. Why!? Why would you want to do this when there are better solutions?
It also keeps the size and weight down to meet the stated requirements. He is asking for something for quick deployment and easy transport and the best you guys can come up with is a full size rhombic.
Absurd. No one suggested a rhombic.
So, do any of you geniuses have a suggestion for the op that meets his requirements or not?
You betcha I do!
Single band dipole, RG174 feed ok for short runs. Multiband dipole, use 300 ohm ribbon line and a mini-tuner.
And some advise: RG174 is pretty fragile stuff. You're not likely to be wanting to string your antenna real high for practical reasons, so you might consider using RG58 for better durability. The losses of RG174 are manageable at HF if the VSWR is low, like you get with a single band dipole. Running it as a non-resonant multiband dipole can see VSWR run to 20:1 or more.
At 28 MHz, that can make the feedline loss for a 35 foot piece run from 1.5 db (1:1) to over 6.5 db (20:1), so I strongly recommend you don't use it in a multiband antenna.