GottIstGutig
Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2005
- Messages
- 74
Is it true? (So RR says)... the biggest county in the US's sheriff's department uses CSQ? lol Can anyone verify this?
GottIstGutig said:Is it true? (So RR says)... the biggest county in the US's sheriff's department uses CSQ? lol Can anyone verify this?
sfdf said:may understating is what i heard, learned/ san francisco ems is encrypted
i guess they got spooked about the hospital / client privacy act.
just wondering why not more city's have gotten scared and gone that way. ??????????/
sfdf said:just wondering why not more city's have gotten scared and gone that way. ??????????/
bill71 said:It is kind of funny that that agency is so easy to monitor.
Bill H
JoeyC said:bill71 said:It is kind of funny that that agency is so easy to monitor.
Bill H
I'm curious why you feel LASO is so easy to monitor when you must listen to 2 freqs to get the whole conversation?
Both of the primary SF EMS channels are indeed encrypted. They're digital too, to bootscnnr said:According to the RR database SFFD EMS 1 & 2 Medic to Hospital are digital. That does not mean that they are encrypted.sfdf said:may understating is what i heard, learned/ san francisco ems is encrypted
i guess they got spooked about the hospital / client privacy act.
just wondering why not more city's have gotten scared and gone that way. ??????????/
SF has no UHF channels anymore. They are entirely on the 800MHz trunked system. SF EMS 1 & 2 (Medic-Hospital 7 & 8) are both digital AND encrypted talkgroups. As was mentioned elsewhere this was done mainly for HIPAA complaince.PeterSz said:akardam - can you clarify? Which 2 SF EMS channels are encrypted? 462 Mhz or 800 Mhz Talkgroups? Amb to Hosp or Dispatch? peter S