• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

Make an impact on national emergency communications planning!

N1GAW

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
1,290
Location
Raleigh, NC
#1
The US Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is seeking feedback on proposed updates to the National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP)—the Nation’s strategic plan to improve emergency communications. Informed by last year’s SAFECOM Nationwide Survey, the NECP provides guidance to those that plan for, coordinate, invest in, and use communications to support response and recovery operations. This includes traditional emergency responder disciplines (e.g., law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services, dispatch) and other entities that share information during emergencies, such as medical facilities, utilities, nongovernmental organizations, as well as the media and private citizens. National Emergency Communications Plan (NECP)—the Nation’s strategic plan to improve emergency communications. Informed by last year’s SAFECOM Nationwide Survey, the NECP provides guidance to those that plan for, coordinate, invest in, and use communications to support response and recovery operations. This includes traditional emergency responder disciplines (e.g., law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services, dispatch) and other entities that share information during emergencies, such as medical facilities, utilities, nongovernmental organizations, as well as the media and private citizens. The comment form is available at:

National Emergency Communications Plan
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
275
Location
High Desert, CA
#2
Not sure if I'm allowed to comment on this particular post; but it would seem that this would be an opportune time for those of us in the "private sector" so mentioned in this document to voice our concerns about relevant radio communications topics in the realm of public listening and information dissemination. This, in particular, would cover the topic of encryption and its specific uses and abuses as it relates to public communications. It could also be used, I can envision, as an avenue of sorts to bring up and diplomatically tear down the idea that the listening public is a bad thing, that it somehow hinders day to day or even emergent operations and could be used to show that in dire situations the public to be much more of a help than a hinderance. This, of course, would need to be done diplomatically and with due respect to those involved who truly believe that they are doing the right thing.

As a private citizen who has been involved in radio listening of all sorts- including public safety scanning- for the last 17 years of my life as well as a full time member of the "emergency medical services" that the document so mentions, I do sincerely plan on writing up a public comment on all of this and hope that you in the Radio Reference community as well as others would be so inclined to follow me into this. This might well be a foot in the door to the hopeful ideal of curtailing the needless overuse of encryption in the true interest of the listening public.
 

DaveNF2G

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 23, 2001
Messages
9,064
Location
Rensselaer, NY
#3
I would advise anyone who wishes to comment to avoid making any "legal" or "Constitutional" arguments unless you have the education and/or training to do so accurately. The FCC might even disregard such comments from anyone who cannot sign Esq. to their comments.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2013
Messages
46
Location
Columbus, Indiana
#4
Not sure if I'm allowed to comment on this particular post; but it would seem that this would be an opportune time for those of us in the "private sector" so mentioned in this document to voice our concerns about relevant radio communications topics in the realm of public listening and information dissemination. This, in particular, would cover the topic of encryption and its specific uses and abuses as it relates to public communications.
If you're going to post a comment to the FCC about it, I would highly suggest quoting the document by objective and line number. It shows that you've read the document, and that you're suggesting a change to it.

For example, you'd likely want to reference Objective 6.2. Mitigate cybersecurity vulnerabilities and suggest that line 991 be changed from "Public safety organizations implement interoperable encryption, as needed" to "Public safety organizations implement interoperable encryption for tactical communications, while keeping general communications unencrypted for public review and highest levels of interoperability.", or something like that.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
162
Location
Land of entrapment
#5
I will say some places like new Mexico have a coming uniform aes keys for interops, other uses in the primary channels of those they mou with with a inteorp key to access mains in participating agencies which most are on board. So interoperability issues won't be question in future so keep that in mind if encryption is hated.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
2,756
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
#6
I would advise anyone who wishes to comment to avoid making any "legal" or "Constitutional" arguments unless you have the education and/or training to do so accurately. The FCC might even disregard such comments from anyone who cannot sign Esq. to their comments.
Very well stated. Persons should think VERY CAREFULLY before submitting ANYTHING to the FCC. VERY CAREFULLY.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2013
Messages
46
Location
Columbus, Indiana
#7
interoperability issues won't be question
Any time you have encryption keys involved, interoperability issues are always a question and have to be balanced with actually keeping the keys secure. The more interoperability you have, the harder it will be to keep it both secure and usable. This pretty much applies to all encryption, radio or not.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2014
Messages
819
#8
After the 9/11 goat**** the FCC decided that as part of the transition to digital TV, the newly cleared 700-MHz frequencies would be used for national emergency ops intercommunication. So in theory, by now, every "emergency" agency should have the ability to use 700MHz equipment that can interoperate with every other emergency response agency.
"How's that workin' for you?" (Dr. Phil)

In Fort Lauderdale, their radio systems failed during the FLL airport shooting two years ago, and again last year during the Parkland school shootings. Police couldn't reach other police agencies, let alone fire rescue, and that's all in the same county.

The FCC made a lot of recommendations post-Katrina, and AFAIK nothing got implemented. So, really, they need more input? They can't even mandate reasonable costs for WPS cell priority.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
375
#10
After the 9/11 goat**** the FCC decided that as part of the transition to digital TV, the newly cleared 700-MHz frequencies would be used for national emergency ops intercommunication. So in theory, by now, every "emergency" agency should have the ability to use 700MHz equipment that can interoperate with every other emergency response agency.
"How's that workin' for you?" (Dr. Phil)..
Actually it works very well, it comes down to planning and training.

In Fort Lauderdale, their radio systems failed during the FLL airport shooting two years ago, and again last year during the Parkland school shootings. Police couldn't reach other police agencies, let alone fire rescue, and that's all in the same county..
To clarify the system did not fail (as in go down). The system was overloaded (lot of busies).. This is what happens with Poor system planning, it was system admins fault (IMO). And could have been avoided.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
275
Location
High Desert, CA
#11
For what it's worth, I'll throw in my two cents here. I can say that as one who works in the public safety field (EMS side of it) encryption is way overused and pointless 90+% of the time. I have the same exceptions about encryption as most on here, SWAT, narcotics, vice, etc. But when the local FD's have encrypted "admin" channels that are used for ordering pizzas and coffee during training days, it seems a bit of a waste of taxpayer dollars and technology. I work for the largest county in the lower 48 states and the company I work with subscribes through the county system and has an encrypted channel and I can tell you that there is absolutely no need for it, there is NOTHING that we say or do that needs to be nor should be hidden from the public. It's hard to hide anyway what with all of these facebook local news groups that post anytime a police car, fire truck or ambulance goes anywhere.

Now to the topic of so called interoperability. As we all know, 9/11 was a turning point for emergency communications in many ways, not the least of which was the idea of interoperability between agencies and in some cases within the same agencies themselves. And bear in mind that this was before the cell phone revolution that we have today! One of the biggest complaints during the 9/11 events was that no one could talk to each other; where are we today?

In every major event that has happened since 9/11, one of the biggest complaints from first responders still is that people can't talk to each other, not to mention systems getting overloaded by the garbage man and dog catcher and street sweeper all chatting away like a group of hams on 40 meters. Now I know that this isn't happening 100% of the time in all incidents, but enough to still say that the idea of 'interoperability' has not worked out well at all. What the actual numbers are I don't know, I only know what first responders who have been involved in incidents have told me. What I do know is that more encryption and more channels are not going to solve the problem.

On a more personal level, where I work we are on a new digital phase I system and all law enforcement and EMS and a select few fire channels have gone encrypted. Now I will reiterate that certain channels do warrant encryption but that for the most part it is overused and pointless. We are at a point now where on medium scale incidents like an MCI the preferred method of on scene comms is having people run (or walk) to different people to get information around. It is either that or play the literal game of telephone between different dispatch centers. That is not interoperability, that's a middle age courier system. Our rigs have scanners in them to listen in to the agencies that are not programmed in our radio, and with the encryption going on, we have lost the ability to judge dynamic situations for any danger by not being able to hear other agencies, namely sheriffs office. Things can change quickly in the field and it is nice to know what is going on in real time.

Interoperability would be great if it was actually implemented right. The problem is, everyone wants their slice of the pie and they don't want anyone else knowing anything about it, even people that they work with. The situation today is political and dangerous and is going to get people hurt.
 

N4GIX

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
1,718
Location
Hammond, IN
#12
FWIW, I've personally found that NIFOG is an incredibly dense and complicated set of protocols to follow. Apparently the nice folks at HS don't believe in the KISS principle. :whistle:
 

flythunderbird

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
954
Location
Grid square EM99fh
#13
Interoperability would be great if it was actually implemented right. The problem is, everyone wants their slice of the pie and they don't want anyone else knowing anything about it, even people that they work with. The situation today is political and dangerous and is going to get people hurt.
Like so many things in government, it's an inter-agency turf war - any side effects of the turf war are secondary until someone does get hurt, and then it's still a turf war.
 
Last edited:

DaveNF2G

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 23, 2001
Messages
9,064
Location
Rensselaer, NY
#14
Overloaded systems will keep happening as long as politicians will only pay for the least they can get away with and the sales reps keep kissing their butts. Practically nobody with decision making power as to what system will be purchased and how it will be spec'ed understands trunking well enough to make correct choices, and the sales people are motivated not to explain it to them.

The "dirty little secret" of trunking is that it is just like conventional in terms of how many people can use it simultaneously. One user per frequency or repeater pair, or two users per for TDMA/CDMA systems. Assigning 30 groups of people to five repeaters means overload.
 
Top