Mobile milcom/milsat antenna

Status
Not open for further replies.

N8IAA

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,243
Location
Fortunately, GA
Just wondering what ya'll are using for a mobile milcom/milsat antenna. I have a Larsen 1/4~ that is uncut with the lowest frequency of 136MHz. Works ok, but would like better. Any suggestions? Has anyone tried the Super M?
Wondering,
Larry
 

Alliance01TX

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
386
Location
DFW Texas
Mil-Com /Mil-Satcom

Howdy

The questions around Mil-Com and Mil-Satcom are likely more complex in the answers as the Mil-Air is used both VHF and UHF (vast majority). The Mil-Satcom is a couple of different areas, as in the UHF-AM Mode from an Air-to-Air/Ground and then we have the 'real' Mil-Satcom that requires a RHC (right hand circular) antenna to the Mil-Satcom birds.

So, a Discone of wideband will give you the best 'utility' coverage, but if you want better coverage you would need a couple of antenn's, especially the RHC if you want better reception of the Mil-Satcom frequencies in my opinion.

Others will likely chime in with better views of what works in various config's....I use an AT-197GR for pure Mil Aircraft in the 224~400 Mhz range with the center around ~311.000 (old SAC Primary) and itworks well. I use a Diamond Discone for Wide-Band and a special made RHC Antenna for SATCOM-On-The-Move (SOTM) use.

Hope the helps.

Thx

Bill
 

N8IAA

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,243
Location
Fortunately, GA
Howdy

The questions around Mil-Com and Mil-Satcom are likely more complex in the answers as the Mil-Air is used both VHF and UHF (vast majority). The Mil-Satcom is a couple of different areas, as in the UHF-AM Mode from an Air-to-Air/Ground and then we have the 'real' Mil-Satcom that requires a RHC (right hand circular) antenna to the Mil-Satcom birds.

So, a Discone of wideband will give you the best 'utility' coverage, but if you want better coverage you would need a couple of antenn's, especially the RHC if you want better reception of the Mil-Satcom frequencies in my opinion.

Others will likely chime in with better views of what works in various config's....I use an AT-197GR for pure Mil Aircraft in the 224~400 Mhz range with the center around ~311.000 (old SAC Primary) and itworks well. I use a Diamond Discone for Wide-Band and a special made RHC Antenna for SATCOM-On-The-Move (SOTM) use.

Hope the helps.

Thx

Bill

For mobile:confused: My question is "what are people using for mobile use"?
Larry
 

N9JCQ

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
919
Location
Lake Barrington, IL
I use the Niljon Super M Mobile coupled to either my 396T, Pro-43 or my Yupi 7100. I think it does damn good for MILAIR. I live in the Chicago area and I can monitor Air to air in Red Hills, near Volk Field and sometimes over Lake Michigan pretty well. These areas are a considerable distance from me.
I do not Monitor MIlsats. I hope this helps
 

N8IAA

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,243
Location
Fortunately, GA
I use the Niljon Super M Mobile coupled to either my 396T, Pro-43 or my Yupi 7100. I think it does damn good for MILAIR. I live in the Chicago area and I can monitor Air to air in Red Hills, near Volk Field and sometimes over Lake Michigan pretty well. These areas are a considerable distance from me.
I do not Monitor MIlsats. I hope this helps
That was what I thought, too. The design lends itself to those frequencies. I have a better chance of having that on the car instead of the turnstile:D
Larry
 

Alliance01TX

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
386
Location
DFW Texas
Howdy

Have a look around relative to the home-brew SATCOM Antenna as discussed in a 2-part Monitoring Times write up a little over a year ago. It was not a mobile version, but for under $50. you can have a nice SATCOM Antenna. The key is the 'phasing' (Right Hand Circular or RHC) that really makes a difference and vastly improved reception....Suspect someone has made a mobile version perhaps?
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,174
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
If you bolt the MT X-wing to your trunk lid it will become a mobile UHF satcom antenna. You could also bolt the bottom pipe cap to a large 3/8-24 mag mount and make it mobile. You would have to shorten the support tube slightly in this case due to the added height of the mag mount.

I drive around occasionally with the commercially made mag mount a few posts up and it gets some strange looks.
prcguy


Howdy

Have a look around relative to the home-brew SATCOM Antenna as discussed in a 2-part Monitoring Times write up a little over a year ago. It was not a mobile version, but for under $50. you can have a nice SATCOM Antenna. The key is the 'phasing' (Right Hand Circular or RHC) that really makes a difference and vastly improved reception....Suspect someone has made a mobile version perhaps?
 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,207
Location
Southeastern Michigan

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,174
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Of the three antennas you listed only one is a satcom and the others are vertically polarized LOS antennas.

I had a Navy SSR-1 antenna and was not impressed, the MT-X-wing project antenna works much better in my opinion.

I also scaled down and built an Eggbeater II antenna for 260MHz and the X-wing worked better. The Eggbeater was complicated to build and needed some odd 93ohm coax for the phasing harness.
prcguy

Here is an antenna I used in the military, for UHF comms:
http://www.wade-antenna.com/TACO/Coax-Stub.pdf

For receive only, the US Navy does/did use these on ship:
Fleet Broadband Subsystem Equipment

If you really want something really stout:
http://www.rfcomm.harris.com/media/RF-3184-AT320_tcm26-9099.pdf

I would consider some type of turnstile antenna, also called an "egg beater." The SSR-1 antenna would be a decent platform to start with, and pare down the ruggedness a bit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top