• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Motorola Radio Management for Large Fleet

Status
Not open for further replies.

jthorpe

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2003
Messages
381
Reaction score
161
I am the lead programmer for a large public safety agency and we are currently using CPS for all of our radios. I'm responsible for approximately 7500 radios spread out across the state. In order to make changes, especially when programming several hundred at a time, we have to travel often. So do the users. It's expensive and time consuming.

I've read some of the older threads about Radio Management. Some are 2016-2018. In may of 2019, are we still looking at the same issues? Is firmware still an issue where multiple codeplugs need to be built?

Even if we don't go wireless, which we wont; I can at least setup programming stations across the state for our users to connect to. I would just like some feedback from people who are using radio management currently. More specifically with large, spread out fleets. Any feedback on your experiences would be greatly appreciated.
 

xmo

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
383
Reaction score
272
Motorola has made some changes in their RM offering. It started as a buy it once pricing model. Now they are migrating RM to a recurring cost service based product. You should check with your sales rep to see if you can live with the new pricing.

Also, with the original product you set up your own local RM server and path all your remote device programmers to that (sometimes that can be a challenge).

Now the call that "on-prem". They now also offer a cloud based RM server. That might make it easier for you to set up the device programmers over a wide area.
 

jthorpe

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2003
Messages
381
Reaction score
161
Thanks for the info. I've been in touch with them and I'm waiting on a demo for now. Hopefully that will happen in the next few weeks.
 

kv6o

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
59
Reaction score
50
We've looked at it, and I think we'll see it in our future, esp. with the parts of the fleet that are all APX. However, still can't remotely tune, so you still have to touch your fleet periodically... Are you looking at OTAP/OTAR as well?
 

ILMRadioMan

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2009
Messages
404
Reaction score
5
Location
The road to no where.
I can tell you that full blown RM with both OTAP and WIFI programming is a saving grace in large systems. I've been involved with a county system that is 3000+ radios using full, on-prem (local) RM, and it has saved some butts more times than can be counted. It was available during the transition onto the system, and corrections were made on the fly to mitigate serious issues.

For the size of fleet you stated, I would say it's going to be a huge help to you.
 

jthorpe

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2003
Messages
381
Reaction score
161
We've looked at it, and I think we'll see it in our future, esp. with the parts of the fleet that are all APX. However, still can't remotely tune, so you still have to touch your fleet periodically... Are you looking at OTAP/OTAR as well?

At this time we are not looking at OTAP or OTAR. As an initial rollout, we would probably activate 10 or so programming stations strategically placed around the state, to cute the drive down for users from 100+ miles to hopefully less than 50. If it works well, then add to the system in phases.
 

jthorpe

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2003
Messages
381
Reaction score
161
I can tell you that full blown RM with both OTAP and WIFI programming is a saving grace in large systems. I've been involved with a county system that is 3000+ radios using full, on-prem (local) RM, and it has saved some butts more times than can be counted. It was available during the transition onto the system, and corrections were made on the fly to mitigate serious issues.

For the size of fleet you stated, I would say it's going to be a huge help to you.

Thanks for the info. I'm also thinking it would. It's a tough fleet to manage as it currently stands but we are doing it. I would just like to see our travel time cut down, along with the user. When making a major change or updating another system for our interop stuff, such as a type II upgrading to P25 etc, it would be a lot easier to push out those updates then travel to 10 counties and do the radios one by one. Not only that but with a fleet this large, it's difficult to manage the aliases when transfers or moves occur. Having RM would allow me to simply push a new plug out, then use RM for my alias database even if we have to export then import into the zone controller.
 

jthorpe

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2003
Messages
381
Reaction score
161
Funny thing. I wasn't a fan of APX when they first came out. I actually hated them. That was until I found out how easy they are to program compared to the XTS / XTL series. Now if I can just get my firmware and flash codes updated to match. whew!!!
 

wa8pyr

Retired and playing radio whenever I want.
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,754
Reaction score
4,397
Location
Ohio
Funny thing. I wasn't a fan of APX when they first came out. I actually hated them. That was until I found out how easy they are to program compared to the XTS / XTL series. Now if I can just get my firmware and flash codes updated to match. whew!!!

Agree on the easier to program part, except for two little things. . .

1. That scrolling window within a scrolling window nonsense. Massive PITA.
2. The call lists. Can't just put numbers and alias names into a list anymore; now you have to create a contact and add it to a hot list. Even more massive PITA.

I'm guessing whoever wrote the APX CPS doesn't do a lot of radio programming.
 

ILMRadioMan

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2009
Messages
404
Reaction score
5
Location
The road to no where.
Additionally, another benefit of RM is the ability to put non-technical people into good use.

With RM, you can build a codeplug and queue it. If it's a big codeplug (perhaps voice files, big changes, etc) you can get someone with an RM client on a laptop with a connection back to the RM server (vpn or direct network). This will allow you to utilize high bandwidth broadband connection to push big changes simply by having a person with a laptop.

This can be exceptionally useful if the apx radios don't have access to a common wifi AP (ap, but the laptop can connect through a hotspot, then a VPN to the RM server.
 

ILMRadioMan

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2009
Messages
404
Reaction score
5
Location
The road to no where.
I mean, your point is valid, but perhaps the best way to word it is: it is only useful with apx. Just because you have other radios on the system, doesn't mean it isn't worth it.

If you have large groups of MSI radios, it came definitely be worth it, even if other departments use other vendors.
 

Thunderknight

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
2,226
Reaction score
470
Location
Bletchley Park
We use it for a few hundred APX radios. Internally hosted with WiFi APs spread around, all on it's own VLAN and SSID. Love it. Turned what used to be an arduous task of updating radios to something that takes far less time. Worth every cent in labor savings.

I can't answer your firmware question...I have not run into that yet (we don't jump on the latest FW), but I did read that too.
 

ILMRadioMan

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2009
Messages
404
Reaction score
5
Location
The road to no where.
You CAN push firmware and flash updates over RM. The only thing you can't do is tune a radio, although there are tools that can tell you when a radio is out of tune, by measuring over the air.
 

TampaTyron

Beep Boop, Beep Boop
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
1,226
Reaction score
524
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I setup MOTOTRBO RM systems and train system managers in the use of RM almost weekly. It is a saving grace. I would recommend VPN or at least your own VLAn for all device programmers. We have used windows tablets, industrial PCs, regular PCs, and laptops as device programmers without issue. You would basically train a few admin people at each location in connecting and running device programmer/device monitor software. I would stay away from the kiosk approach where just anyone can walk up and start connecting stuff to the DP. Your network will need to be capable of multicast from the the DP to the radio (which should be fine if you are using programming cables, more of an issue if using WiFi). Once you use it, you won't go back. My largest customer has 22k radios....... TT
 

kv6o

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
59
Reaction score
50
We do the same with Diagnostx, but only have one of the older models. The newer ones can have multiple slave receivers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top