Name the antenna connector!

Status
Not open for further replies.

photoguy2

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
121
Can anyone tell me what type of antenna connector this is? It looks like maybe a tnc?

Thanks

Matt
KJ6PNN
 

Attachments

  • pic.jpg
    pic.jpg
    74.5 KB · Views: 3,121

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,296
Location
Central Indiana
A little history...

TNC = Threaded Neill-Concelman connector
BNC = Bayonet Neill-Concelman connector

Both were developed by Paul Neill of Bell Labs (who had previously developed the N connector) and Carl Concelman of Amphenol (who had previously developed the C connector),
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,129
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Judging by the male and female TNC connector and digital cammo background the jumper cable in the first post would be used as an antenna extension cable for a military MBITR or PRC-152 hadheld where the radio would sit on the soldiers chest and the antenna is remoted high on a vest or pack.
prcguy
 

photoguy2

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
121
Judging by the male and female TNC connector and digital cammo background the jumper cable in the first post would be used as an antenna extension cable for a military MBITR or PRC-152 hadheld where the radio would sit on the soldiers chest and the antenna is remoted high on a vest or pack.
prcguy

Dang, you guessed;-) That is the cable for a PRC-152 antenna. I just was not sure what type of connector it was. The picture of the cable connector was better then that of the actual antenna.

TNC it is.

Thanks guys. And thanks W9BU for the history.

Matt
KJ6PNN
 
Last edited:

photoguy2

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
121
Do you have a 152?
prcguy

In my dreams I do. ;-)

I'm just thinking of using the antenna for a project of mine. I hike/backpack a lot. All of the longer HAM high-gain antennas I have tried have broken within a few hikes. I though I would try one of the wide-band 152 antennas. I figure if they are tough enough for SF, they are tough enough for me. I already use Sabers, because they are so much tougher. One or two trips to the heat/sand of Death Valley and the snow of Glacier Park seem to do the HAM radios in.

Matt
KJ6PNN
 
Last edited:

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,129
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Before TCI marketed the MAST, which is a remote antenna kit for the MBITR and others, I built and tested basically the same thing including field strength comparisons between a stock MBITR and one with a remote antenna high on a tactical vest and on a backpack.

I found the remote antenna with a 1/4 wave dangling counterpoise for VHF/UHF or a 1m long dangling wire for the 30-90MHz band really perked up the performance over the radio with stock antenna. I also made a choke balun at the antenna base by wrapping a few turns of coax around a #43 mix toroid core.

The stock rubber whips for the MBITR and PRC-152 are not as efficient as a similar size but tuned whip, so unless you need the very wide BW stick to a tuned whip. I shipped several prototypes made with both RG-58 and RG-316 Teflon coax to guys in Afghanistan and got great feedback, then TCI released their version about a month later. TCI is making good money on theirs but mine still works better.
prcguy



In my dreams I do. ;-)

I'm just thinking of using the antenna for a project of mine. I hike/backpack a lot. All of the longer HAM high-gain antennas I have tried have broken within a few hikes. I though I would try one of the wide-band 152 antennas. I figure if they are tough enough for SF, they are tough enough for me. I already use Sabers, because they are so much tougher. One or two trips to the heat/sand of Death Valley and the snow of Glacier Park seem to do the HAM radios in.

Matt
KJ6PNN
 

photoguy2

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
121
Ah, I see.

Thanks for the ideas, you have me thinking ;-)

I do use a homemade MAST, like yours, it's just a piece of teflon RG-58, a molle buckle, and quite a bit of duct tape.

Two reasons. First. I do need the wide band. In particular, I would like to have both 2 meters, and GMRS (460) in one antenna. I use a dual brander HT when things are easy going, and swap out sabers when things are rough. Hence the wide band. I have (and do) use a tuned antenna with a tail (Smiley) and it works great. The reason for the 152 antenna, is that I can feed it through the molle on my pack (Unlike the smiley, or any dual band antenna I have come across) and it will take a beating.(again, unlike any dual band whip I have found).

Thanks
Matt
KJ6PNN
 
Last edited:

mancow

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Feb 19, 2003
Messages
6,908
Location
N.E. Kansas
The mbitr rubber whip seemed to exhibit peak resonance around 200mhz when I swept one but was still pretty good in the vhf fed range.
 

photoguy2

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
121
The mbitr rubber whip seemed to exhibit peak resonance around 200mhz when I swept one but was still pretty good in the vhf fed range.

How did it do around 440 and 460? Or did you test up there.

Matt
KJ6PNN
 

JMC0302

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
2
Location
NC
Because of forum rules denying me PM ability, how would one go about building a system like this specifically for the PRC-152? Also what materials are required?
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,129
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
First decide on what type of coax you want. Typically they use RG-58 but I've made them from very small RG-316 Teflon coax which is about half the diameter of RG-58 and has a native coyote brown color and blends well with desert cammo, multicam, etc.

Then you would want a good quality, preferably flat black TNC male right angle connector for the radio end and a straight female TNC connector for the antenna end. Measure the needed cable length by running the coax or other wire through your kit, then install connectors and I like two layers (and two different lengths) of hot glue heat shrink tubing as connector to cable strain reliefs.

Then you need a way to attach the antenna end to you kit and I've had good success with Rip-Tie Velcro cable wraps. Besides the cable, connectors and heat shrink you need the proper crimpers for the connectors and a way to thoroughly test the cable while thrashing the connections if its going to be used in a life or death application. The heat shrink on the connectors shown in the pic at the start of this thread is not very good and that will lead to early connector/cable failure on a body worn antenna system.
prcguy



Because of forum rules denying me PM ability, how would one go about building a system like this specifically for the PRC-152? Also what materials are required?
 

JMC0302

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
2
Location
NC
How did you go about the testing? I'm infantry by trade and not a commo. Also what did this run you cost wise? I'm looking to make a few for my platoon and another buddy's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top