New Putnam County 700Mhz - Hoosier SAFE-T or Stand Alone ?

19-685

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
185
Location
Monitoring Attack Plan R on CRM-114 Discriminator
Last week's FCC license grants indicate a new P-25 system (or possibly a new SAFE-T two-site simulcast sub system) for Putnam County.


Two sites: Bainbridge and Cloverdale

WSJA913

769.85625
770.51875
771.74375
772.28125
772.95625
774.49375

Anyone have additional details on this newly licensed system?

I'm guessing this may be a new site for Hoosier SAFE-T.

Thanks
19-685
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
14,948
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Yep, it's simulcast, but if it was SAFE-T, seems like they would just upgrade the multiple existing sites to an simulcast, and it would be a SAFE-T license. So very well could be they are putting up their own system. Anyone seen any RFP etc from Putnam for vendors etc?
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,504
Location
Central Indiana
Putnam County Commissioners meeting minutes for January 8, 2025:
The Commissioners president announced that 911 Director Dave Costin has resigned. The position was to be advertised.

February 3 minutes:
1752545108928.jpeg

February 17 minutes:
28 applications for 911 Director submitted, narrowed to 6, background checks and interviews to be conducted.

March 3 minutes:
1752545672924.jpeg
March 17 minutes:
1752545779623.jpeg
Here's the kicker...Dave Costin appears in the June 16 minutes and is identified as "911 Director". There are some executive session minutes that contain nothing useful. Personnel matters are usually handled in executive session.
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
14,948
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Design Services – Pyramid Consulting These guys. No mention of who they roll with. So no clue if this will be an EFJ, Motorola, or L3 Harris. They have offices right across from the City-County building downtown at Washington Street here in Indy. Also bizarre that radios were to be online by (March/April), but just now even a license, and currently all Putnam is still full SAFE-T.
 
Last edited:

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,504
Location
Central Indiana
Is that phase 2 or it is phase 1
The license was only recently issued and wouldn't contain that information anyway. But, the system does not appear to be online yet. Until the system is online and people monitor it, we won't know the details.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
16,405
Location
BEE00
Actually, the license contains some clues if you know what to look for. Specifically for WSJA913, the emission designator of 9K80F1E on the repeater frequencies indicates L3Harris MASTR V H-DQPSK TDMA (Phase II).
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,504
Location
Central Indiana
Seems like this will be standalone system since the license shows Bainbridge and Cloverdale. There's already a SAFE-T site in the Bainbridge area (the other is at ISP Post 53 near Putnamville). The northwestern part of Putnam County has some hills and hollers. I wonder if two towers will provide enough coverage.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
16,405
Location
BEE00
What's the advantage to going to a standalone system vs SAFE-T? Long term cost savings?
The #1 advantage is complete autonomy; don't have to answer to anyone when you want to add another site or another 1000 subscribers to the system, don't have to follow arbitrary rules and whims of the state, etc. Depending on how much the state charges (or doesn't charge) in infrastructure maintenance and/or subscriber fees for SAFE-T, there may be long term savings involved, although it's not cheap to build/operate/maintain your own system either. All of that burden shifts from the statewide machine and tax base to the relatively small county. I'm sure they've done the calculations, although they may only be interested in doing their own thing above all else including short/long term costs.

Also, covering a 500 sq mi county with just these two subsites on 700 MHz? Uh, no, not even with 300W ERP unless they care only about mobile coverage (which will be spotty at best in some areas). Even VHF would struggle to provide that coverage from those same subsites.

1752716948779.png
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,504
Location
Central Indiana
Assuming it's a standalone system, Putnam County will probably program their radios with channels/talkgroups of surrounding counties as well as the SAFE-T mutual aid channels. They may also set up their console(s) with the ability to patch their channels/talkgroups with others.
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
14,948
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Most of the program would be done by the state anyway. IPSC does almost all radio templates for everyone. Be a lot like ours, main zone would be theirs, with mutual aid zones etc... The surrounding areas would need to add a new zone for PC, or they would just use the current set up to interop on. Marion, Hamilton, Madison counties all have Zone 1 being local, and then other 3 zones of the MESA family, rest of Zones are SAFE-T, and conventional.
 
Last edited:
Top