• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

NIST proposed budget includes shutdown of WWV and WWVH

Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
8,884
Location
PA
#2
IMO they are redundant, now that you can get an even more accurate time signal from GPS globally 24/7/365, rather than only at night when the signal propagation conditions are right.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
8,884
Location
PA
#6
Well, it would be redundant if all the devices in service can receive the GPS signal. Can they?
By that logic, you could never retire any obsolete technology.

GPS uses a smaller antenna that is far more efficient than a HF loop when built into watches and similar devices. And as mentioned before, GPS s available 24/7/365, isn't dependent on atmospheric conditions for propagation, and covers the entire globe, rather than just CONUS.

It makes sense to give some warning before shutting down the HF stations so that device manufacturers have some time to transition, but other than support for legacy devices, ther's no compelling reason to keep WWV & friends running.
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
51
#8
GPS uses a smaller antenna that is far more efficient than a HF loop when built into watches and similar devices. And as mentioned before, GPS s available 24/7/365, isn't dependent on atmospheric conditions for propagation, and covers the entire globe, rather than just CONUS.
There's just that pesky line-of-sight thing. Ever tried to get a decent GPS signal in a building?
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
2,127
Location
Cleveland, OH
#9
It does not specifically say that WWVB is included in the proposal (whether it's not, or the details aren't there).
I was wondering about that. Assuming WWVB would stay - how much could they possibly save by keeping the infrastructure for WWVB and only axe-ing WWV and WWVH?

I have a feeling this proposed cut will die.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
8,884
Location
PA
#10
There's just that pesky line-of-sight thing. Ever tried to get a decent GPS signal in a building?
Yes, on a daily basis:
https://1drv.ms/v/s!ApJIS-l4xqPtgvBTKC_FuPNTLonOsQ

In the linked video, I test a GPS modded 436 scanner. The red & green flashing LED on the bottom right of the front panel goes solid green when satellite lock is lost. To break satellite lock, I have to take it down into the basement and put it inside a metal safe.
 

belvdr

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
289
#11
GPS reception varies greatly on the chip used. I recall my first GPS navigator would lose signal all the time and was slow to lock. Also, some chips are very slow to report they've lost their lock.
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
9,905
Location
Point Nemo.
#12
With GPS and NTP, WWV is getting a bit out of date. I can't remember the last time I used WWV to manually set a clock.

Originally it was great for high seas navigation, but with GPS in nearly everything, it's not as useful as it was. The power, upkeep, maintenance, redundant systems, etc. all get expensive. Maybe it's time to let it go.


However, I do have a clock at home that uses WWVB, and I'd like that to keep working.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2017
Messages
269
Location
British Columbia, Canada
#13
I have neither GPS devices nor WWVB clocks, but no longer set my clocks to WWV's HF service, due to propagation issues. The signal invariably fades out just before the tone marking the next minute. In fact, sometimes I can't even hear which minute is coming up. Instead, I've been synchronizing my PC to NIST's time servers, and then using the PC as a reference in manually setting my other clocks. Having said that, I wonder if those time servers are on the chopping block, as well. If so, maybe I'll just build myself a sundial and check the local time during daylight hours, then add the appropriate number of hours for UTC. Of course, I'd still be roughly 15 minutes out, since I don't live right on the meridian for our time zone. But then, it's a cheap solution! :lol:

As for WWV's propagation forecasts at minute 18, I now access them on the web at https://services.swpc.noaa.gov/text/3-day-forecast.txt . If that gets eliminated too, I guess I'll just have to determine the propagation conditions myself by looking for DX on the shortwave bands. That's like going back in time to my low-tech childhood, when I first started listening to shortwave.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,644
Location
Wichita Falls, TX
#14
Instead, I've been synchronizing my PC to NIST's time servers, and then using the PC as a reference in manually setting my other clocks. Having said that, I wonder if those time servers are on the chopping block, as well.
There are plenty of other internet time servers if NIST shuts theirs down.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2017
Messages
269
Location
British Columbia, Canada
#16
There are plenty of other internet time servers if NIST shuts theirs down.
True, and often a couple of the NIST servers don't respond, anyway. Sometimes I have to use "utcnist.colorado.edu". The Windows 7 time sync dialogue also lists "time.windows.com", but that has never worked for me.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,442
Location
San Francisco, Ca.
#17
Still living in the past at this QTH. I still use WWV for setting clocks every DST change, for general prop checks, and on the rare occasion my R71a or my R75 float off-zero beat, to massage the SSB pots with their signals.
They will be missed here. There's CHU Canada on 3330, 7850, and 14670kHz for those, that is if I can even get a reliable enough signal from them here.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2010
Messages
96
Location
SoILL
#18
Well ain't that just great. After I've spent good money to buy radio controlled clocks and a couple of watches. I hate changing time twice a year and resetting clocks after a power outage. Guess I'm lazy.
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
9,905
Location
Point Nemo.
#19
Well ain't that just great. After I've spent good money to buy radio controlled clocks and a couple of watches. I hate changing time twice a year and resetting clocks after a power outage. Guess I'm lazy.
Those usually use the 60KHz signal from WWVB.
The proposed shutdown was to WWV and WWVH.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2017
Messages
269
Location
British Columbia, Canada
#20
Still living in the past at this QTH. I still use WWV for setting clocks every DST change, for general prop checks, and on the rare occasion my R71a or my R75 float off-zero beat, to massage the SSB pots with their signals.
They will be missed here. There's CHU Canada on 3330, 7850, and 14670kHz for those, that is if I can even get a reliable enough signal from them here.
My R75 seems to be pretty accurate for zero beating signals, although when using that technique for ECSS on SW broadcasters, I find that it depends on the station. Some stations appear to be slightly off frequency, while others are dead on. Most of the ham stations are right on frequency. Those that are not are often told so by their contacts, or they eventually correct their settings during QSOs without having to be told.

As for CHU, I can hear them pretty well after dark on 7850, but lately I haven't been able to find them on 14670 at any time of the day. WWV in Colorado is usually stronger, but then it's also closer, and my best reception here is from the southerly direction, anyway.
 
Top