w2xq
Mentor
The new RR looks good, and I applaud those who struggle with the database files. I noted the "Statewide" entries whereas truth be told only W3BXW and W2NJR are as close to being wide area repeater systems as you can get.
I dumped the data into Google Docs and fixed the "Statewide" county entries. A few entries were added, and duplicates and one New York repeater are marked by striketrhough text. There are more repeaters to be added but I thought it best to adjust just the ones now posted.
A second page is added to the attached Excel spreadsheet. It is identical to the first sheet but with the deletions of two columns.It is a suggestion to make the database a bit easier to read. Repeater input frequencies (except the 2m 1 MHz offsets) aren't needed, nor are input and output tones. As I say, this is just a suggested layout. Comments are welcome.
Hope this helps.
Tom
I dumped the data into Google Docs and fixed the "Statewide" county entries. A few entries were added, and duplicates and one New York repeater are marked by striketrhough text. There are more repeaters to be added but I thought it best to adjust just the ones now posted.
A second page is added to the attached Excel spreadsheet. It is identical to the first sheet but with the deletions of two columns.It is a suggestion to make the database a bit easier to read. Repeater input frequencies (except the 2m 1 MHz offsets) aren't needed, nor are input and output tones. As I say, this is just a suggested layout. Comments are welcome.
Hope this helps.
Tom