• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:

No bait! Fish may respond to sound

Not open for further replies.
May 7, 2004
RLG, Fly heading 053, intercept 315 DVV
I don't know. This is just plain madness. Why not shove an RFID tag into the fish's ass? :lol: (Cows use RFID instead of bells)

We can't stop trying to control nature, can we? Like trying to cage a generically altered shark.. Some how I can't help but wonder if the sharks and all the other predators will decode this signal and stroll in. :lol:

If the government wants to fund something in the name of the "environment", then they should go to a place where the water is highly polluted, such as Hong Kong and work with them.

While their at it, build a few ocean wind mills too. :twisted: :lol:
Last edited:
Not open for further replies.