Agree with you 100%. My friend just got one. It is NO way near the audio quality of a Bearcat BC125AT or sensitivity on VHF/UHF and we both have the Diamond RH77CA antenna. People tend to over-buy as I've said numerous times.Home use . The 536 sounds like it’s under a blanket
I agree that the internal speaker is terrible. You can probably use an un-amplified speaker if you choose one with less bass and more treble to compensate the sound curve of the 536 audio. I use a small 2 inch speaker and the audio sounds almost perfect to me when all the bass are cut out. I use this speaker but probably any good quality small speaker will do. KL1 | peiker International, Inc
.
/Ubbe
A Baofeng UV-8HP/UV-82 has BETTER audio then any Uniden Bearcat handheld scanner period. This is really pathetic and it is a "CHINESE" import too even though a transceiver and not a true scanner.Home use . The 536 sounds like it’s under a blanket
I looked at the back of it and it says 20 ohm. This came from a taxi cab that had the speaker just behind his head. I assume the high impedance make it less effective and the volume control on a 2-way radio are in a better range with a speaker one foot from your ear. It will automaticly reduce any background hiss or hum from the scanners internal electronics and I use volume 9-10 on the BCD536. I think you can use any speaker with a small cone size for the BCD536.Is this the 4 0r 8 ohm version?
A Baofeng UV-8HP/UV-82 has BETTER audio then any Uniden Bearcat handheld scanner period. This is really pathetic and it is a "CHINESE" import too even though a transceiver and not a true scanner.