• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

pre amps ! any good

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 17, 2005
Messages
4,439
Location
Grand Lake St. Marys Ohio
#2
Your going to get mixed results on this one, for some it overloads the scanner and others they work well. GRE makes a couple of different models. I personally would invest in a good antenna and coax before going to a preamp.............Hoser
 
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Messages
97
#3
Take Hoser's advice and see how much of a difference it makes. If you're still not satisfied then go for an amp. If you don't live too close to any cell towers, paging transmitters, radio stations, or other high power transmitters, preamps work great.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
266
Location
Home
#4
My experience with preamps has always been disappointing with two notable exceptions:

1) old, low sensitivity radio. The preamp did its job nicely here, making the combination 'acceptable' - not brilliant though.
2) modern radio (two way repeater actually) with excellent filtering, quite good sensitivity. Placed a TUNED preamp on the receiver, before the combiner, and achieved approximately 5 dB performance improvement.

In my experience, preamps are definitely not a good thing to have if you're anywhere near the cities with lots of strong signals around - except if you are using a TUNED preamp, with a TUNED (ie single band) radio with good filtering.

Broadband 'scanning' type preamps are going to be of benefit if you're out on the fringes away from any nearby FM, TV, paging etc transmitters, and you have a radio thats low on sensitivity to begin with. A very sensitive radio (eg Yupiteru 7100 etc) probably wouldn't benefit at all from a wideband preamp in this situation, and a narrowband tuned preamp would likely only make a minor difference.

Also note that the higer the gain, the worse the results can be! For example, my tuned preamp above only had 10dB of signal gain - and it only produced 5dB actual improvement. That's normal. If I put a 20dB gain preamp on there, it worked far far worse - in fact worse than if the preamp was not there at all !!
Another thing to take into consideration is Noise Figure. The higher the NF of a preamp, the worse it will be. Broadband preamps are noisy - about 5-10dB NF usually. Narrowband tuned preamps are better, with NFs of 0.5 to 3dB depending on just how good they are.
 

thewenk

Idaho DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
637
Location
Eastern Idaho
#6
Do a search on this site and you will find plenty of previous discussions about the pros, cons and types of preamps.

Dave
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top