• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Programming remote M7300 question

Status
Not open for further replies.

ElroyJetson

Getting tired of all the stupidity.
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
3,931
Location
Somewhere between the Scylla and Charybdis
Oddly this has never come up for me before.

When programming an M7300 with a remote mount head ONLY, is it good practice to program it via the mic connector on the remote head,
or is there a strong recommendation to use the serial port on the back of the radio unit instead?

This hasn't come up for me before because my own remote mount M7300 is a dual control head setup, with the M7300 having its own attached control head
and a second head connected via CAN cable. I've always programmed it via the mic connector on the radio unit.

If there's a higher rate of programming errors with one method than the other, then obviously I want to avoid that method.
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,140
Location
Central Colorado, USA
Either SHOULD work just as fine (though as others have noted, there’s no hard fast rule), as should the db9 on the rear of the remote head. Just depends on what’s the most accessible and whether MDT is enabled… The mic should always work regardless of MDT settings. Maybe I’m lucky, but I’ve never encountered a programming error. The only time rpm has needed to attempt a second write after a fail, is when I format the flash disk from the VA menu.

-B
 

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,677
Location
Hubert, NC
We always use the serial port on the MRU as the mic connector takes forever to update firmware. We just use the serial cable for everything. It is rare that I ever use the mic cable for anything.
 

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,677
Location
Hubert, NC
We have also noticed a lot of failures when loading a UKEK via the mic cable. Not so with the serial cable.
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,140
Location
Central Colorado, USA
We always use the serial port on the MRU as the mic connector takes forever to update firmware. We just use the serial cable for everything. It is rare that I ever use the mic cable for anything.
Ya, I really think of the mic connector as an accommodation for front mount heads where the radio is in a console… it’s never my first choice. MRU 9pin is my go-to as well, even for 100M MRU firmware updates with a CH100… only the head firmware goes USB.

-B
 

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,677
Location
Hubert, NC
That is true. We only have one CH100 radio and it is just a test radio. We found out that serial doesnt work with the CH100 XG100....LOL. All of our other XG100M and CS7000 are CH721.
 

wa8pyr

Retired and playing radio whenever I want.
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,415
Location
Ohio
We always use the serial port on the MRU as the mic connector takes forever to update firmware. We just use the serial cable for everything. It is rare that I ever use the mic cable for anything.

Ditto, the CH721 cable takes forever and 18 days to do anything, let alone firmware updates. I only use it if I’m programming a radio mounted in a vehicle, or indoors such that I can’t get to the serial port on the back of the radio.

When I do an install (which is rare as I’m officially the administrator and not supposed to be doing such things), I put a DB9 serial cable on the back of the radio and leave the other end somewhere inconspicuous so I can get to it easily when I need to.

Beyond that, I’ve never had an issue programming or doing firmware updates with the CH721 cable; it’s just really slow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top