Not sure if that was a reply to my post or not.
I believe all P25 channels use 9600.
In the case of Phase I audio and ALL control channels, that is available 100% of the time.
In the case of Phase II audio, it's only available 50% of the time due to the two timeslots, so you end up with half of the data you would for a Phase I audio transmission. Trying to convey the same information (or information type) using half the data will result in less resolution, hence added artifacts.
Hello,
It is per slot.
73 Eric
OK. So Phase II is using half the overall data rate for voice data and less than half of the Error Correction.
Suffices to say it will likely never sound as good as Phase I.
Hello,
P25 Phase 1 is a 7200 bps IMBE vocoder using 4400 bps voice and 2800 bps error correction.
P25 Phase 2 is a 3600 bps AMBE+2 vocoder using 2450 bps voice and 1150 bps error correction.
You can not compare the two directly via bit rates as the AMBE+2 vocoder encodes voice at lower rates better. There are less bits percentage-wise dedicated to the error correction for Phase 2, so voice quality may degrade faster as signals get weaker. Error correction is only used for the important bits, so voices sound more robotic on weak signals.
73 Eric