ANL almost never works???
I’d say it’s a matter of what is the advertised function versus the actual result.
ANL/NB are “okay” . . . until one moves from the Children's Band (gear quality) to the world of Amateur.
When I bought the W-M DSP Speaker it was based on dissatisfaction with CB (was running a new DX-99V2 and a pair of Wilson 2000 on an oilfield Pete), as I
strongly felt or intuited that I wasn’t hearing as well as I should. Old-fashioned “large car” where RF Bond was far better than plastic fleet trucks.
I hadn’t run across anyone who’d tried it. But I couldn’t see any reason it wouldn’t work.
Boy, howdy, did it ever. But I’d almost bought the radio a second time as to price.
— That’s where I started having conversations with men at a distance didn’t sound strained to me. And the men I rode with (same trucks) couldn’t hear to whom I was speaking.
That’s the difference
Automatic Noise Limiter living up to its name should provide. Except that it was an outboard digital signal processing filter which filled the bill.
If ANL as a function term hadn’t been taken, it’d be a better sounding one versus
Noise Reduction Circuitry.
Consider having this installed in the Grant if you do a resto job on it:
Some of the more advanced radios have adjustable bandwidth; narrowing that a bit will help.
You mean if I pay DukDik in the Desert $900 for a $350 radio with a two-year wait that his modifying for full-bandwidth usage wasn’t the thing? (Don’t answer that).
.