Repeater Offsets

Status
Not open for further replies.

MNRotrMedic

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
147
Location
Central Minnesota
Hi all-i know i'm sorta asking for repeat info i would like for someone to steer me towards a website or provide info on standard repeater offsets across the bands. I understand the the UHF offset is a standard 5 megahertz above the output frequency (in: 466.000 out: 461.000). I would like similar information for VHF, 800mhz and such info please. I find it very useful for when i'm searching through the FCC database trying to ID new stuff. Thanks in advance for any replies.

Matt
 

diskmonger

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
485
Location
Michigan
Matt_45 said:
Hi all-i know i'm sorta asking for repeat info i would like for someone to steer me towards a website or provide info on standard repeater offsets across the bands. I understand the the UHF offset is a standard 5 megahertz above the output frequency (in: 466.000 out: 461.000). I would like similar information for VHF, 800mhz and such info please. I find it very useful for when i'm searching through the FCC database trying to ID new stuff. Thanks in advance for any replies.

Matt

You're correct, the UHF stuff is generally 5Mhz above the repeater frequency. VHF on the other hand, if your speaking about public safety, could be anywhere. most of the depts in my area (michigan) all have different offsets.
 

nd5y

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
12,028
Location
Wichita Falls, TX
This is a general rule of thumb and doesn't count
ham radio bands and other special cases.

30 - 50 no standard offset
138 - 174 no standard offset
220 - 222 +1 MHz
406 - 420 no standard offset
450 - 470 +5 MHz
470 - 512 +3 MHz
746 - 806 +30 MHz
806 - 896 -45 MHz
896 - 940 -39 MHz
 

MNRotrMedic

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
147
Location
Central Minnesota
Thanks nd5y, though i was REALLY hoping that there was a standard offset for VHFfrequencies. Although it is comforting to see that most of the inputs run higher than the outputs. That gives me a rough outline to work with.
 

K5MAR

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2002
Messages
2,265
Location
Stillwater, OK
Matt_45 said:
Thanks nd5y, though i was REALLY hoping that there was a standard offset for VHFfrequencies. Although it is comforting to see that most of the inputs run higher than the outputs. That gives me a rough outline to work with.
Matt, the problem on VHF is that too much of it was already allocated before repeaters became economical enough to be popular. To establish a standard offset would have required the FCC to totally reallocate the VHF band, a move that (for various reasons) would make the upcoming 800 MHz rebanding look simple by comparison.

Dem's da breaks! :lol:

Mark S.
 

OpSec

All your WACN are belong to us
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,924
Location
Monitoring the database
Most of the VHF systems around here are 153-155 MHz outputs with 156-159 MHz inputs...makes for some short antennas with those high inputs.
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,059
stateboy said:
Most of the VHF systems around here are 153-155 MHz outputs with 156-159 MHz inputs...makes for some short antennas with those high inputs.

Uhhh. the difference between 154 and 158 MHz is 0.46 inches (less than half an inch). You are not telling me you can see that on an 18" antenna, are you?

Besides, most antennas have enough bandwidth to cover the entire PS band when cut for the center (155 MHz).

Many antennas come precut, too, and cannot be trimmed without losing the ball on top.

Note: I'm talking about quarter wave antennas here.

Joe M.
 

DaveH

Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2001
Messages
3,287
Location
Ottawa, Ont.
nmfire10 said:
That is pure cooincidence.

I wouldn't call it that myself. The number of cases I've
seen in 450-470 that don't use positive offset are very
small (in fact I can't think of any, just odd cases that
don't use 5MHz).

I realize this question is for the US. In Canada,
the "5MHz" offset may be 5.0000 or 5.0125, or 4.9875
less commonly. There are also cases of 4MHz in the 420-430
band. There is no T band (470-512) but I'm sure +3.000
MHz is the US rule, barring odd exceptions.

Dave
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
DaveH said:
I wouldn't call it that myself. The number of cases I've
seen in 450-470 that don't use positive offset are very
small (in fact I can't think of any, just odd cases that
don't use 5MHz).

I realize this question is for the US. In Canada,
the "5MHz" offset may be 5.0000 or 5.0125, or 4.9875
less commonly. There are also cases of 4MHz in the 420-430
band. There is no T band (470-512) but I'm sure +3.000
MHz is the US rule, barring odd exceptions.

Dave


I think the issue is that if it is a band with coordinated repeater pairs then the offset is ALWAYS according to the coordinated structure (E.G the chart)
If it is a band that is NOT set up with coordinated repeater pairs, then just because more bands have a positive offset rather than a negative offset is irrelevant to helping you find the specific offset of that repeater.

Clear?
 

OpSec

All your WACN are belong to us
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,924
Location
Monitoring the database
Voyager said:
Uhhh. the difference between 154 and 158 MHz is 0.46 inches (less than half an inch). You are not telling me you can see that on an 18" antenna, are you?

Besides, most antennas have enough bandwidth to cover the entire PS band when cut for the center (155 MHz).

Many antennas come precut, too, and cannot be trimmed without losing the ball on top.

Note: I'm talking about quarter wave antennas here.

Joe M.

We don't use 1/4w antennas...5/8w whips that are cut too short (IMO) for 159 MHz.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top