Roof antenna recomendations

Status
Not open for further replies.

yorkphotog

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
488
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Hey all, I'm just looking for anyone with some suggestions about the best scanning antenna for me to mount on the side/roof of my townhouse. I currently have a large ugly antenna in my attic, but am moving and would like to put one outside.

I'm looking for something with good VHF/UHF/800 performance, without being a total eyesore for the townhouse complex.

The cable run will only be about 30 ft or so from the roof to the radio, so I should be fine to use something w/ coax cable.

Thanks!
 

436isthe1

Whistler ws1080/Uniden 436hp/GD-77and Cobra 29 ltd
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
181
Location
Missouri
Hey all, I'm just looking for anyone with some suggestions about the best scanning antenna for me to mount on the side/roof of my townhouse. I currently have a large ugly antenna in my attic, but am moving and would like to put one outside.

I'm looking for something with good VHF/UHF/800 performance, without being a total eyesore for the townhouse complex.

The cable run will only be about 30 ft or so from the roof to the radio, so I should be fine to use something w/ coax cable.

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • HSR-DCL-B.jpg
    HSR-DCL-B.jpg
    10.5 KB · Views: 38

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,155
Location
United States
I'm looking for something with good VHF/UHF/800 performance, without being a total eyesore for the townhouse complex.

To get that sort of coverage, you pretty much have two choices.

Under the "eyesore" category, you have several options of discone antennas to choose from. Diamond makes pretty good ones that are not too expensive. And while they are not terribly pretty, they do have thin elements that blend in well.

Other option would be to do a Larsen NMO-150/450/800 with an NMO base station adapter. That'll give you good performance in most installations, provide some actual gain on UHF and 800, and will be pretty low profile.

and get 30 feet of LMR-240 with an N male connector on one end to connect to the above base station adapter mount, and a connector to match your scanner.
 

yorkphotog

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
488
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
To get that sort of coverage, you pretty much have two choices.

Under the "eyesore" category, you have several options of discone antennas to choose from. Diamond makes pretty good ones that are not too expensive. And while they are not terribly pretty, they do have thin elements that blend in well.

Other option would be to do a Larsen NMO-150/450/800 with an NMO base station adapter. That'll give you good performance in most installations, provide some actual gain on UHF and 800, and will be pretty low profile.

and get 30 feet of LMR-240 with an N male connector on one end to connect to the above base station adapter mount, and a connector to match your scanner.

Nice, I like this idea... Thanks! But what about the lack of a ground plane (specifically for VHF)? Whenever I've tried the Larsen tri-band indoors, without putting the mag mount on a baking sheet etc, the signal is awful...

Does the base station adapter not require a ground plane?
 

daddyjohn

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
236
I use an OMNI-X antenna and it works great with lmr-400 coax.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,155
Location
United States
Does the base station adapter not require a ground plane?

The base station adapter I linked to has an NMO connector on top and an N connector on the bottom. Between those two is the 'adapter' and it has 4 ground radials that stick out the side and provide the proper ground plane for the antenna.
 

sallen07

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
1,298
Location
Rochester, NY
Other option would be to do a Larsen NMO-150/450/800 with an NMO base station adapter. That'll give you good performance in most installations, provide some actual gain on UHF and 800, and will be pretty low profile.

I put this combination up on Halloween and I have been very happy with it. Definitely a less "visible" option. From 15-20 feet away you can hardly see the vertical and won't even notice the radials unless you know they are there and are looking for them.
 
Last edited:

zl1tkl

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
7
Location
bay of plenty
well how about that some who think their antennas are ugly good news for you the majority think they are absolutely beautiful I have a 4.5 meter dish and no-one has ever said it was ugly most admire the marvels of its design and its construction comparing it to other engineering marvels icon the world ! So drop the preference for nit picking females and get a real woman who has appreciation for effort . Antenna work on a basic theory strength is proportional to capture area the more capture area the more signal strength and that cant be classified as a fashion statement . I f you were to build it yourself then its something to be proud of and that cant be ugly can it your choice ???
 

yorkphotog

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
488
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Thanks everyone - this isn't my area of expertise so your help is appreciated! Judging from the replies, I think I'm going to go with the Laird base adapter, with the appropriate antenna and coax cable.

With respect to the mount/mast, what's the best route for that? I've attached a pic of where I plan on installing the antenna - it'll likely be mounted to the brick, right at the top of the peak.
 

Attachments

  • house.jpg
    house.jpg
    64.6 KB · Views: 56

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,155
Location
United States
With respect to the mount/mast, what's the best route for that? I've attached a pic of where I plan on installing the antenna - it'll likely be mounted to the brick, right at the top of the peak.

The antenna will be lightweight, so you don't need a lot. Simple/cheap approach will work:
 

436isthe1

Whistler ws1080/Uniden 436hp/GD-77and Cobra 29 ltd
Joined
Jun 10, 2020
Messages
181
Location
Missouri
Thanks everyone - this isn't my area of expertise so your help is appreciated! Judging from the replies, I think I'm going to go with the Laird base adapter, with the appropriate antenna and coax cable.

With respect to the mount/mast, what's the best route for that? I've attached a pic of where I plan on installing the antenna - it'll likely be mounted to the brick, right at the top of the peak.
Put antenna at the peek, height is Mite.
Thanks everyone - this isn't my area of expertise so your help is appreciated! Judging from the replies, I think I'm going to go with the Laird base adapter, with the appropriate antenna and coax cable.

With respect to the mount/mast, what's the best route for that? I've attached a pic of where I plan on installing the antenna - it'll likely be mounted to the brick, right at the top of the peak.
 

yorkphotog

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
488
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Both the Widegard end mount and J-mount look interesting...

With the J-mount, is there an additional pole I would need to mount the actual NMO base adapter? From the pics it looks like a satellite dish pole, and I'm not sure if i would need to put a pole in it first?

The end mount looks like it's good to go as it is, and I would just attack the base adapter directly to it.
 

popnokick

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
2,908
Location
Northeast PA
Either type of mount is going to require a mast at least five feet long to get the antenna above the roofline and allow attachment of the radials. The adapter is designed to mount atop a mast.
 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,203
Location
Southeastern Michigan
Both the Widegard end mount and J-mount look interesting...

With the J-mount, is there an additional pole I would need to mount the actual NMO base adapter? From the pics it looks like a satellite dish pole, and I'm not sure if i would need to put a pole in it first?

The end mount looks like it's good to go as it is, and I would just attack the base adapter directly to it.
The gable mount shown above does not include the mast.

With a J mount, you can attach this directly to the integrated pole:
 

lu81fitter

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
669
Location
Marshall County, Illinois
I used to have satellite TV at my house. When I discontinued service, I removed the "dish" part of the antenna and stuck a pole in the "J" mount. I then mounted the exact same thing that mmckenna recommended (ground plane kit). It works quite well. The ground plane kit in the pic is an old one that was home made, but you get the idea. Antenna.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top