So common sense, and a bit of reading inform me that a directional antenna should perform better than an omnidirectional for the task of listening and transmitting to satellites.
I purchased a the Arrow II LEO Antenna (Arrow Antenna Hand Held Portable dual band 146 437 440 arrowii Yagi Satellite) specifically for this purpose.
Now, I can hear the satellites on my yeasu FT-7900r http://www.yaesu.com/indexVS.cfm?cm...4B638CB8E0F201158C&DivisionID=65&isArchived=0 with an omnidirectional dual band antenna (2m&70cm), but I haven't been able to try the yagi with that radio yet.
I have tried the yagi with my BCD396xt http://www.uniden.com/scanners/bcd396xt-compact-apco-25-handheld-scanner/invt/bcd396xtg/ scanner. I can hardly get any reception with that setup.
I compared selectivity specs between the two, is this my problem?
FT-7900r : 0.2 μV for 12 dB SINAD (420 - 520 MHz, FM)
BCD396XT: 0.3μV 380—512 MHz NFM
Any input would be GRATEFULLY appreciated!
I purchased a the Arrow II LEO Antenna (Arrow Antenna Hand Held Portable dual band 146 437 440 arrowii Yagi Satellite) specifically for this purpose.
Now, I can hear the satellites on my yeasu FT-7900r http://www.yaesu.com/indexVS.cfm?cm...4B638CB8E0F201158C&DivisionID=65&isArchived=0 with an omnidirectional dual band antenna (2m&70cm), but I haven't been able to try the yagi with that radio yet.
I have tried the yagi with my BCD396xt http://www.uniden.com/scanners/bcd396xt-compact-apco-25-handheld-scanner/invt/bcd396xtg/ scanner. I can hardly get any reception with that setup.
I compared selectivity specs between the two, is this my problem?
FT-7900r : 0.2 μV for 12 dB SINAD (420 - 520 MHz, FM)
BCD396XT: 0.3μV 380—512 MHz NFM
Any input would be GRATEFULLY appreciated!