I cannot agree with you on this because on the SDS 100 the digital systems all sound very clear with good audio quality, but the analog vhf and uhf sound like a transistor radio from the 1950's. If it was just the speaker size then the digital systems would sound just as poor. Besides the same size speaker is used in the 436, 396 t and xt and all of them sound great on analog. This is a problem with the design of the SDS 100 and I want to know if the sds 200 sounds better because I am thinking about buying one.The audio quality is limited by the speaker size you can fit into the SDS100 case, and has nothing to do with digital/analog RF signal format. If you use good headphones or external speaker, the SDS100 audio has plenty of bass.
The SDS200 has a larger speaker than the one in the SDS100 which has better low-frequency response.
Do you listen to any analog channels on it? How do they sound?Only my opinion, But i thought the 200 speaker sounded muffled...I bought me an external speaker for my SDS 200
Nope, because the low frequency cutoff for digital audio is about 100Hz, and the cutoff for analog is about 300Hz (100-300Hz is used for DCS and CTCSS tones). So they aren't going to match tonally because of the difference in audio frequency range. The speaker in the SDS100 has a little less low-frequency response compared to the 436 because of its waterproof design, so the already-tinny analog audio sounds even more so because of the speaker.I cannot agree with you on this because on the SDS 100 the digital systems all sound very clear with good audio quality, but the analog vhf and uhf sound like a transistor radio from the 1950's. If it was just the speaker size then the digital systems would sound just as poor. Besides the same size speaker is used in the 436, 396 t and xt and all of them sound great on analog.
No, i only monitor Ohio MARCS P25Do you listen to any analog channels on it? How do they sound?
Thanks good info on the frequency response of the 100Nope, because the low frequency cutoff for digital audio is about 100Hz, and the cutoff for analog is about 300Hz (100-300Hz is used for DCS and CTCSS tones). So they aren't going to match tonally because of the difference in audio frequency range. The speaker in the SDS100 has a little less low-frequency response compared to the 436 because of its waterproof design, so the already-tinny analog audio sounds even more so because of the speaker.
But if you use high-end headphones, there's essentially zero difference between the SDS100 and 436 audio.
So if I replace the speaker in the 100 with a new speaker from a 436 my analog on the 100 will sound the same as it does on the 436?SDS100 sounds great using any external speaker in both analog and digital, so have nothing to do with the audio circuits, it's just a speaker problem.
/Ubbe
Have you heard the audio on the 200 is it clearer
So if I replace the speaker in the 100 with a new speaker from a 436 my analog on the 100 will sound the same as it does on the 436?