CameronCole
Newbie
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Messages
- 1
I think you're wrong.The CPU in the scanner are scanning thru the TG list, stepping thru it one increment at a time, in a similar way to how it scans channels.
Wrong. It takes less than 1/10s for talkgroup info to show scanning the WV-SIRN system, which has over 1500 talkgroups programmed. Talkgroup lookups are indexed by talkgroup ID, so doubling the number of programmed talkgroups does NOT double the lookup time.If I remember correctly from the debug file a SDS100 scans TG's at a rate of 10/mS. So if you have 10,000 TG's programmed and the detected TG isn't included in that list then it would take one additional second until the scanner begins to go to the next site, if you do not have ID search on. If the detected TG matches with the last one in the list it would take one second until audio are heard and the info are shown on the display.
The scanner needs to stay at least 1,5 sec on a control channel to properly decode the data and perhaps someone has 1,000 TG's associated with a site and that would only add a worst case of a 0,1 sec delay, so shouldn't be any major issue. The CPU in the scanner are scanning thru the TG list, stepping thru it one increment at a time, in a similar way to how it scans channels.
/Ubbe
.... someone has 1,000 TG's associated with a site and that would only add a worst case of a 0,1 sec delay, so shouldn't be any major issue.
We seem to agree of the time it could take to scan thru the TG list at the rate that the debug file shows.Wrong. It takes less than 1/10s for talkgroup info to show scanning the WV-SIRN system, which has over 1500 talkgroups programmed.
I think you're wrong.
The scanner looks at the control channel to determine where to tune. It doesn't scan talk groups.
See post #3