• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

SDS100 vs Motorola - DSP audio delay

Status
Not open for further replies.

Anderegg

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
1,442
Location
San Diego
#1
Can anyone who has compared an SDS100 to a Motorola, advise how close the audio processing is between the two in P25 and analog? I run multiple scanners next to Motorola radios, and found that the delayed audio in the x36HP scanners resulted in a very noticeable echo effect. The Whistler WS/TRX match just about perfectly, s easier to understand what is being said when both receive the same transmission at the same time.

Paul
 

ofd8001

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
6,002
Location
Louisville, KY
#2
I had the opportunity to be listening to a P25 TRS with a Motorola radio, 436 and SDS100 a few months ago. I did not notice any appreciable delay in "timing" of reception.

There is a delay if there is an "analog to digital", but I think that's normal and nothing specific to what type of radio/scanners are involved.
 

Anderegg

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
1,442
Location
San Diego
#3
I can attest that the 436/536, next to a Whistler or Motorola, will have an audio processing delay factor equivalent to placing two identical radios, one at a distance of 20 feet away. When trying to listen to 6-7 receivers at once, the added delay puts a real strain on the mental processes responsible for discerning information from the voice, which can be an issue.

Paul
 

buddrousa

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
5,170
Location
NW Tenn
#4
I have also seen all the same brand and model radios at the same scene echo.
All Motorola's
All Kenwood's
P25 systems
DMR systems
NXDN systems
I have seen this at a SO with 3 DMR walkies APX's
I have seen this at a wreck 3 P25 APX8000's
I have seen this at a local site 3 NXDN NX5300's
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
8,884
Location
PA
#5
I can attest that the 436/536, next to a Whistler or Motorola, will have an audio processing delay factor equivalent to placing two identical radios, one at a distance of 20 feet away. When trying to listen to 6-7 receivers at once, the added delay puts a real strain on the mental processes responsible for discerning information from the voice, which can be an issue.
If you have 6-7 receivers all listening to the same transmission, you're always going to have variations in the timing of audio output even if they are all the same brand and model, due to buffering, and where the CPU happens to be in the processing loop when the transmission starts being received.

The real question is why do you have 6-7 radios listening to the same channel?
 

Anderegg

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
1,442
Location
San Diego
#6
Not all hit the same channel, but certain talkgroups do. And I have never dealt with any buffering of live scanner audio, and the delay, if significant enough, make some audio transmissions unintelligible. Just look at the timing of human speech, throw in even just a 100-200ms delay, and you start loosing sylabal sync and such, it is a mess.

I use a main Motorola radio to "lock in" an active incident, but that same channel will still be spitting out of the scanner that alerted me to tune the Moto into it.

Paul
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
8,884
Location
PA
#7
And I have never dealt with any buffering of live scanner audio, and the delay, if significant enough, make some audio transmissions unintelligible.
Wrong. All digital audio is buffered. Especially with TDMA, buffering is mandatory, or the audio would cut out 50% of the time. On the transmission side, audio is digitized, packaged into frames, and transmitted. In the receiver side, those frames are received, decoded, and converted back to audio. Typical time from mic to speaker is about 400ms. This is related to the frame size, and how much digital data you need to decode a segment of audio after error correction and decompression, etc.

I've noted audio timing variations between two DMR radios receiving the same transmission, as well as two scanners receiving the same digital transmission even though they were identical models running the same firmware. It's not a bug in the x36 series, it's just something inherent to digital radio.
 

Anderegg

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
1,442
Location
San Diego
#8
I meant I have never heard a buffering variance between two identical scanners on non TDMA. I use the term DSP processing as a catch all for these things that delay the speaker output of the decoded received audio. Anyone know any links to an SDS100 next to a Whistler or Motorola on the same talkgroup?

Paul
 

Anderegg

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
1,442
Location
San Diego
#10
Haha, not a complaint or demand, it is just an important factor in my purchasing decision for 20 new Phase II scanners for my TV station. :)

Paul
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
8,884
Location
PA
#11
I meant I have never heard a buffering variance between two identical scanners on non TDMA.
I have, and so have others, with scanners and multiple brands of digital radios, on all the major digital formats. It's just part of live digital audio.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
1,752
Location
Colorado
#12
Audio can also be delayed on the same talkgroup if you try to monitor different sites due to network latency. I have heard delays using the same model of scanner parked on different sites.
 

buddrousa

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
5,170
Location
NW Tenn
#13
I have 2 Digital TV's at the Fire Station of the same brand and make same tv channel 1 second delay in decoding they are one room apart and very annoying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top