Kenwood: TH-D74 antenna

Status
Not open for further replies.

jazzboypro

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
942
Location
Laval
Hello all,

Just received my TH-D74 today, for those of you who have one, did you replace the stock antenna with something else if so what are you using ?

Thanks

73
Sylvain
VA2FCS
 

Hit_Factor

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
2,465
Location
Saint Joseph, MI
I swept the antenna on my thd74 ht, it came in very good. Probably won't find a better one unless you go longer, like 18 inches. I think there is only one tribander option available commercially.
 

jazzboypro

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
942
Location
Laval
I swept the antenna on my thd74 ht, it came in very good. Probably won't find a better one unless you go longer, like 18 inches. I think there is only one tribander option available commercially.

Thanks, i don't think i'll be using 220 so i guess a dual band would be enough for me. I'll use the stock antenna for now. I was just wandering if there was any other antennas available
 

tweiss3

Is it time for Coffee?
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
1,210
Location
Ohio
I have the Diamond SRH320A tribander and it works a bit better than the stock, its just long at 14".
 

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,416
Location
California
+1 on the Diamond SRH320A. I first used it with the Kenwood TH-F6A. I then purchased more and use them on other radios/receivers and definitely with the D74A. Even if you do not use it for 1.25 meters, it is a great handheld antenna for 2 m and 70 cm.

I used my D74A stock antenna for testing and put it back into the box. Still, for only 2m and 70cm the stock antenna was not too bad. The stock antenna was much worse on 1.25m than the SRH320A.
 

N4DJC

Active Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
860
Location
Upstate
Whatever you do, don't lose the D74A stock antenna, it's over $80 from Kenwood or PacParts.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
9,953
Location
Central Indiana
I think I'm on my second SRH320A. The issue that I have with it is that the element above the "bump in the middle" is very flexible while the rest of the antenna is kinda stiff. That upper element will take a set if it's bent too far. As I recall, I accidentally broke my first one at that point. I keep wondering if a piece of heat shrink tubing about 2 inches long so it will bridge the upper element to the "bump in the middle" would provide some reinforcement to that junction.
 

eorange

♦RF Enabled Member♦
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
3,028
Location
Cleveland, OH
I have both the SRH320A and the SRH77CA and the latter is better. I can hit repeaters farther with better quieting. But oddly enough the 320 seems better for APRS.
 

jazzboypro

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
942
Location
Laval
I programmed the repeaters in my area into the radio and just went outside to see how it does with the stock antenna. I'm glad to see that i was able to hit several of them and even some that are pretty far from my QTH. I wish it was an Icom, i much prefer Icom's system to program the radio.
 

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,416
Location
California
Hmm...I have not destroyed any of mine yet, but that thin bit at the top has a slight lean on one of them. I do like your idea of the shrink tubing for support, so I made the fix by building them up (Left to Right). On the last one (black) I did not overlap at the top, as it would not shrink down to the size of the little whip of the antenna, but fits fine on the red. Even with the initial white tubing I could feel and see the difference with a slight shake. Each additional layer helped, as one would expect.

On the far right image of a different antenna, I made it progressive and longer. Each tube is 2 cm. It definitely re-enforces that spot.
SRH320Afix.jpg IMG_1763.jpg

I think I'm on my second SRH320A. The issue that I have with it is that the element above the "bump in the middle" is very flexible while the rest of the antenna is kinda stiff. That upper element will take a set if it's bent too far. As I recall, I accidentally broke my first one at that point. I keep wondering if a piece of heat shrink tubing about 2 inches long so it will bridge the upper element to the "bump in the middle" would provide some reinforcement to that junction.


I have all three versions of the 77CA antenna. No other dual band antenna I have tested beats them on UHF in the amateur band. On VHF it is definitely not as good as the 320A. I presume the repeaters you hit further were UHF. I can also see how the SRH320A performed better for APRS as it is much improved on VHF.
I have both the SRH320A and the SRH77CA and the latter is better. I can hit repeaters farther with better quieting. But oddly enough the 320 seems better for APRS.
 
Last edited:

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,131
Location
Southeastern Michigan
Has anyone compared the durability of the Diamond SRH320A to the Comet HT224?

I recently bought the Comet and the first day the antenna started separating from the base, while walking the dog with the TH-D72 clipped to my pocket.
 

W8WCA

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Messages
605
Location
/usa/oh/cmh EM89kx
I think I'm on my second SRH320A. The issue that I have with it is that the element above the "bump in the middle" is very flexible while the rest of the antenna is kinda stiff. That upper element will take a set if it's bent too far. As I recall, I accidentally broke my first one at that point. I keep wondering if a piece of heat shrink tubing about 2 inches long so it will bridge the upper element to the "bump in the middle" would provide some reinforcement to that junction.
I had that happen to mine but it is still good as ever just has a slight tilt above the coil
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top