the best coax

Status
Not open for further replies.

thomasbillman1

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Apr 9, 2012
Messages
482
Location
Mesa
i am getting 25ft coax and i want the best, what would you get. its for a base scanner, looking to use the 162.00o to 174.000.
 

Blackswan73

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
1,639
Location
Central Indiana
For 25 feet, you are not going to see any difference between LMR 400, and RG 8X, except price. I would go with the 8X, also known as mini 8 for any run under 50'
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,059
i am getting 25ft coax and i want the best, what would you get. its for a base scanner, looking to use the 162.00o to 174.000.

I doubt you want the best, as it's going to run about $1000/ft and be a total bear to run.

Most likely you want something adequate for the run you have. At 25 feet, 1/2" Heliax will have very little loss - even at 800 Mhz. But that will still run about $5/ft.

Personally, I would just stick with RG-6 at that length. The loss at 800 MHz will be about 1.5dB, but unless you want to get the Heliax, this is likely your best bet. 1.5 isn't that much at 800 MHz.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,216
Location
United States
i am getting 25ft coax and i want the best, what would you get. its for a base scanner, looking to use the 162.00o to 174.000.

1 5/8" Heliax, air core, pressurized with desiccated air. DIN connectors, maybe EIA flange.....


But seriously, like the others said, RG-8, RG-213, LMR-400 would all provide respectable performance for a 25 foot run at those frequencies. You likely wouldn't be able to tell the difference between those cables over that short a distance.
If you haven't terminated coax before, purchase it pre-terminated with the right connector to match your antenna. On the scanner end terminate the cable and then use a flexible jumper to prevent stress on the scanners antenna connector.
 

n5ims

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
3,993
Come on folks, this guy wants "THE BEST", not just something practical. Think 6 1/8" rigid coaxial transmission line. Sure it's heavy. It's expensive. It'll handle more power than your home's electrical service will provide. Since it's heavy copper it'll be stolen by those copper thieves. But the loss at 174 MHz over 25 feet is barely measureable, even with the good tools.

Scroll down to the large stuff and dream! http://www.jampro.com/uploads/product_pdf/Catalogs/Rigid-Catalog Template 2015.pdf
 

zz0468

QRT
Banned
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
6,034
Come on folks, this guy wants "THE BEST", not just something practical. Think 6 1/8" rigid coaxial transmission line. Sure it's heavy. It's expensive.

Damn. That's what I was going to suggest.

Don't forget the dehydrator! It'll add a lot to the cost, but your rigid coax will stay shiny on the inside.
 

teufler

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,356
Location
ST PETERS, MISSOURI
the heavy cable will eventually wear out or rip out the scanners sma or bnc connectors. He didn't say what scanner but the heavy stuff also does not bend too well. rg8-x would be easier and not real noticeable at 25 ft. he was interested in vhf, not 800, so as coupler have suggested, rg8-x is satisfactory. While, as some have suggested hard line, it a "lab" sense they are correct but we don't want to scare him off with the high cost of hard line. Plus connectors cost $250 or more for the big cables. I mean, if he is married and the wife says, something about the cost, he can say I sold the kids to pay for the coax.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top