Hi Rick,
Thanks for your continued improvements to a great piece of software.
I am wondering if you or others know if it is possible to have MPT sites grouped under one system to which they actually belong? At the moment, when I log a number of sites which belong to the one system, they show up as seperate systems in the UT systems tab. It would be great to be able to group sites under one system.
Also having issues with UT not wanting to correctly ID control channels on MPT systems too.
Attached is an example of what is happening - a screen shot and log file for the Ferny Creek site in Melbourne from the SMR (Victoria, Australia). It for some reason constantly wants to make ch 304 the control channel. This is not right though it is a voice channel for this site (chan 304 = 165.2375), with the correct cc of 165.0250 (chan 238). I have tried deleting the 304 and adding 238 but as soon as you delete or uncheck 304 as a cc, it reappears in the list???
Thanks
Thanks for your continued improvements to a great piece of software.
I am wondering if you or others know if it is possible to have MPT sites grouped under one system to which they actually belong? At the moment, when I log a number of sites which belong to the one system, they show up as seperate systems in the UT systems tab. It would be great to be able to group sites under one system.
Also having issues with UT not wanting to correctly ID control channels on MPT systems too.
Attached is an example of what is happening - a screen shot and log file for the Ferny Creek site in Melbourne from the SMR (Victoria, Australia). It for some reason constantly wants to make ch 304 the control channel. This is not right though it is a voice channel for this site (chan 304 = 165.2375), with the correct cc of 165.0250 (chan 238). I have tried deleting the 304 and adding 238 but as soon as you delete or uncheck 304 as a cc, it reappears in the list???
Thanks