"use the adapter to power the active USB data signal amplifiers in the cable" What does this mean?
The cable is "CAT5" ethernet not a usb cable. There are no "AMPLIFIERS" in the cable. I'm using a
50 foot cat5 cable from ebay. NO AMPLIFIERS.
I could have took it wrong but on that products Support tab for the extender on the manufacturers page, they did mention an amplifier. Not in the PDF manual though.
Just under the Support tab info it says:
"The USB 2.0 extender is considered an active repeater, using a small power supply to
amplify the USB signal and preserve the integrity of the data overlong distances."
I took that as meaning the device does have some type of amplifier in it. The function of this amplifier could be the same as those used in USB type extenders like the Tripp Lite model.
Who knows though if the U2EX50 has an amplifier at each end and on both data wires and if the mentioned amplifier is even on the USB signals on the USB side of things or on the wires that carry the USB data but on the ethernet cable side of things.
Any amplifier would be INSIDE the housings at one end or both, NOT in the ethernet cables of course!
They also claim No Drivers but everything I've seen does add a USB Hub to the device list regardless if it is Win, Mac or Linux OS. This is a built in driver for all OSs of course so the claim of no driver should be taken for what it really means that "no additional drivers" are needed. AV Access does state this fact in another one of their support pages.
Either way, it's an interesting device and I could see a use for it with its four port hub at the far end.
I must wonder if they are really converting USB to Ethernet or simply using the 4 pairs available in the spec'd ethernet cables to maintain voltage and signaling and then still using amplifiers like the pure USB extenders use.
The four port hub would still be powered by the included wall wart knowing you can't get 500mA of power at all four ports over that distance when using a single USB port as the source port on a computer.
I'm not knocking the U2EX50 device as like I said, I could find it useful! At the same time, it would be interesting to see inside close up photos of the electronics used in each end.
If chip numbers are legible on both ends, that would tell if it really converts to ethernet or not. If it does convert to ethernet, I wonder why the distance limitation is the same for true USB type extenders.
It sure is a lot cheaper than buying three of the Tripp Lite models to achieve the same distance.
I don't remember for sure but I think just one of the Tripp Lite extenders cost near what the U2EX50 costs and you need three of the Tripp Lite models to equal the same distance! My only Tripp Lite cable end that has the part number and is not sealed is on the roof so no idea on a part number.