• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.
  • Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

We're just past 45 days. Thoughts on your G4/G5 Phase 2 unit?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
115
#1
Title says it all. What are your thoughts & experiences? It can be the Phase 2 out of the box units or those that have been shipped back for the upgrade.

My thoughts:

The flakiness I complained about has largely disappeared. The only nagging issue is the inconsistent volume I get. It's most likely due to the radio on the system and not my pager. I wish there was a way to adjust DAC gain. My issue with channel bleedover has vanished. Very weird. I don't know if it'll come back but it's gone for now.

The only other thing I can think of is that I do a "reset" anytime I take my unit off the charger. I don't know if it helps but it doesn't seem to hurt either.

Durability has been exceptional. A drop on to asphalt from about 6 feet and a day of constant salt water immersion have been shrugged off.

Antenna wise, I've ditched the stubby that came with the unit. The Motorola NAR6595A does a slightly better job with all the foliage that has come back along with trips into areas with taller buildings.

I've got no regrets about the $660 spent and nothing beats being able to clearly receive simulcast traffic while doing 75+ MPH down the freeway or in the rugged foothills of Mt. Rainier. A DMR upgrade would push me towards another G5 but for now, I'll wait and see if the Uniden SDS is the same old crap or something revolutionary.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
34
Location
Violet Township, Ohio
#2
Pros: Absolutely love the G5 (400-470 UHF unit). No issues with anything I want to hear. Simulcast MARCS-IP system in Columbus, Ohio, from Fairfield County? No problem. UHF conventional Pickerington PD? Flawless. Conventional never sounded so good coming through hardware or Bluetooth. Conventional P25 (UHF) from Lancaster PD? Surgical precision, it seems. Literally handles everything I've thrown at it with no alterations to the unit, and returns reliable two-way traffic. Even works in the basement. I personally prefer the Unication programming software to that of Whistler's EZ Scan. Add site frequencies; add talkgroups; set your zones/knobs. Done. It just works, man.

Cons: Full co-sign on volume disparity from radio to talkgroup. It's a noticeable issue. Cannot lockout talkgroups on wildcard search. Encrypted traffic can dominate wildcard output at times, with no way to skip or suppress inaudible, nails-on-the-chalkboard-esque content. Would love to scan more than one site at a time, but it may be impossible as of May 2018. Although it's a sturdy and well-built unit, I've noticed that its vertical balance tends to tip more than you'd expect. Has fell from a table more than once due to slight instability that you would not expect to see from such a heavy piece of hardware.
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2007
Messages
1,044
Location
IL
#3
G4/G5 p2 ??

Sticking ONLY to the Phase 2 question and not 10 other things? .. Phase 2 is PERFECT on mine. Thanks Unication.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
2,957
Location
Fortified Bunker
#4
I like to think of myself as one of the Unication OG’s when it’s popularity wasen’t as known and Unication didn’t even have its own thread ! Some of the issues that bother me from day one still exist (lack of talkgroup hold and nuisance delete, lack of encryption muting, inability to alpha tag RIDs, etc). Some issues that came from firmware updates (limiting zones to 32). HOWEVER, other than a commercial subscriber like my APX, I have not found ANY scanner that can provide me with the reception distance and LSM clarity that I get with my G5, period. I have UHF, 700 and 800 Phase I and II systems from Key West, FL to Massachusetts programmed in and use it everyday. I upgraded the unit to Phase II and the audio is damn near perfect. It would get a perfect score if that slight low volume hiss was gone. I’ve run it side by side with my APX portable and the reception range is about equal. I also like its carry ability...it’s a small package that clips to my belt or sits in my cup holder. After being spoiled with what it offers, you’ll cringe trying to monitor a trunked system on a scanner. I do hear great things about Uniden and their new software defined scanner....similar technology with some good beta testing...if they can master it and add the features that Unication lacks and users have been asking for, I see
the Unication popularity lessening, especially if Uniden offers a mobile and portable version of their SDS line. But I still like Unications portability.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2003
Messages
931
#5
My G4 does the job for me without any negatives.I bought it for the sole purpose of hearing my county's P25 Phase 2 simulcast system which no consumer scanner will reliably receive. I get 100% copy. I have not yet tried it on Philadelphia's simulcast system since I cannot pick that up from home, only when I am mobile near or in the city. I only get down there two or three times a year. I will be in the city in early July so I am anxious to test it then.

I got my G4 from Ray's when he had them on sale. Good buy for $565.
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,977
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
#6
Tested my upgraded G5 on several Phase 2 systems in the last month - mostly 700/800 but also a 400 Mhz system. The Phase 2 quality was as good as the Phase 1 I've seen for more than a year now.

The only issue I encountered was a new county level Harris Phase 2 system.... signal dropouts and voice levels all over the place. In contrast, I listened to a state level Motorola system in the same county (actually every county site) and it sounded great - damn near perfect. I really suspect the issues I was seeing were in the Harris system itself.

And finally, at one point, I was even listening to both of these Phase 2 systems nearly 20 miles outside of the county borders - and the 400 system I was listening to (briefly) 30 miles away.
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
103
Location
Cleveland, OH
#7
There's only one Phase II system in my area and it sounds great with the Phase II update/upgrade. With regard to audio quality before/after upgrade, I'm not sure I hear much of a difference.

I tried using a Laird EXS-806-SF on the Unication but went back to the factory stubby. I'll have to take a look at the Motorola antenna
 

ThePhotoGuy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Messages
1,555
Location
Maryland
#8
I am happy with how the Phase II works on my Statewide Phase II system.

I wish they would do more upgrades with the programming software. Ability to copy and paste talkgroups in the system instead of doing one at a time. The programming software is pretty slow when you are trying to add data too it.
 
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
35
Location
Michigan
#9
I've had my unit for a few weeks now and love the better audio and better reception at lower signal bars. One thing I have noticed is that the recordings audio cuts off at the end a transmission causing there to be the last word or so to be cut off the recording. Other than that performance is great!
 

boatbod

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
1,523
Location
Talbot Co, MD
#10
My county is almost exclusively phase 2 and my G5 has performed well. As an active first responder I do wish there was a way to dual-watch the 700mhz trunked system at the same time as the vhf analog pager tones. As it is I have to remember to twist the knob back to vhf once I'm done listening to the tac channels.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
592
Location
New Jersey
#11
got my g5 preordered from rays and love it. listen primarily to my counties harris phase 2 system with no issues, sounds awesome. the volume variable but i think that’s voice level of the individual user. second system is a moto phase 2 UHF and also sounds great no issues!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

6Paul21

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 2, 2002
Messages
385
Location
Florida
#13
Yes the sound does vary on certain TG's from Hillsborough County Florida and it is Harris. Pinellas County in Moto with no problems with audio.
Ed
 

GTO_04

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
1,763
#14
Title says it all. What are your thoughts & experiences? It can be the Phase 2 out of the box units or those that have been shipped back for the upgrade.

A DMR upgrade would push me towards another G5 but for now, I'll wait and see if the Uniden SDS is the same old crap or something revolutionary.
The SDS 100 is very good. I got to see them in action at the Dayton Hamvention. It is almost as good as the Unication, so I am going to get an SDS and keep my G5. All my other scanners sound like garbage on my local P25 simulcast system by comparison. And I don't have my G5 back yet from the Phase II upgrade so my G5 is probably going to sound even better!

GTO_04
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
206
#15
I could not listen to my town since they went to phase 2. Terrible LSM issues in my location.

I am in my glory with the G4!
 
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
115
#16
The SDS 100 is very good. I got to see them in action at the Dayton Hamvention. It is almost as good as the Unication, so I am going to get an SDS and keep my G5.

GTO_04
Good to hear. My first scanner was a Uniden BC60XLT and I've always had a soft spot for Uniden despite their shenanigans and empty promises.
 

GTO_04

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
1,763
#17
Good to hear. My first scanner was a Uniden BC60XLT and I've always had a soft spot for Uniden despite their shenanigans and empty promises.
Uniden has made a lot of progress and the hardware build quality is very good. My trusty old 396XT has suffered a lot of abuse being dropped etc and it's still kicking. But the digital is lacking compared to the SDS 100 and G5.

I just got an email from Unication saying that my G5 is updated and being sent back to me. That was fast! I just shipped it to Texas from Indiana Monday evening.

GTO_04
 
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
115
#18
Anyone else notice this kind of thing on Harris systems (Phase 1 or Phase 2)?
Our blended Phase 2 system out here in Pierce County is all Motorola and it has this issue. You can hear it whether you're on the County 700 MHz system or the South Sound/City of Tacoma 800 MHz system.

All of the low audio radios I hear have been on Sheriff Talkgroups. Even more perplexing is that radios from other agencies on the same talkgroup don't have this problem. In fact, even if I miss the "State xxx" callsign, I know when a WA State Patrol radio comes up on the local sheriff department talkgroups. Their radios have a very distinctive sound profile.

It probably boils down to the fact that we have multiple agency radio shops out here and some like to tweak audio settings and some don't.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,372
Location
Dallas, TX
#19
You nailed it on the head.

APX radios can have profiles set up. You can reduce the audio and change a lot of parameters. I think thats is why some people hear louder transmissions.

Local fire dept i monitor has 1 engine company that has such low audio its extremely annoying. Its always the same engine no matter what shift is on.
Other units sound fine.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
592
Location
New Jersey
#20
i’m pretty sure after our town went live on our counties harris system they were out a few times, seemed to be tweaking things possibly audio. My FD TGs don’t seem to have the volume issue that others i listen to do, the only strange things is they are all setup/managed by the same company.
Things that make u go hmmmmm!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top