whats the best end code setting for Fleetnet?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tomandnic

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
1
Location
Ontario Canada
whats the best end code setting for Fleetnet listening (yes or ignore)?
I believe a old post said something about it in the past but I cant find the answer.

Thanks
 

LordJ

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
635
Location
South-Eastern, Ontario
I have mine on yes/detect...It basically makes the ID's appear properly if I remember correctly

EDIT: I have gotten the end code and status bit mixed up...my bad...
if the end code is YES - then the scanner returns to the CC when the end code is transmitted
if the end code is IGNORE - then the scanner will return when the carrier drops..(I am assuming this is shortly after the end code is sent)
 
Last edited:

IdleMonitor

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
3,220
Location
The Ottawa Valley - Eastern Ontario
If you have it set on ignore, then you don't hear the white noise (static) after the radio is finished keying up. If you have it on, then you'll hear the static.

Never heard of it being able to show ID's properly or anything like that before.

I keep mine on ignore all the time.
 

motomeso

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
952
Location
Ontario
IdleMonitor said:
If you have it set on ignore, then you don't hear the white noise (static) after the radio is finished keying up. If you have it on, then you'll hear the static.

Never heard of it being able to show ID's properly or anything like that before.

I keep mine on ignore all the time.

You have that backwards,

Detect means it will mute the receiver and switch back to the Control Channel when the end code is heard, kind of like what reverse burst does on a conventional radio.

Ignore means it will stay on that voice channel until the carrier is dropped and you will hear the squelch burst as the receiver closes.

The most efficient and pleasing to the ears is to have the scanner detect the end code.
 

IdleMonitor

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
3,220
Location
The Ottawa Valley - Eastern Ontario
Hmmm, wonder how I got that mixed up. Either which way, I double checked with what you said, and yep, Terry is correct. Guess I'll go back and change my files again.

As you said, it is a lil nicer on the ears. No kerchunk.......



ve3nsv said:
You have that backwards,

Detect means it will mute the receiver and switch back to the Control Channel when the end code is heard, kind of like what reverse burst does on a conventional radio.

Ignore means it will stay on that voice channel until the carrier is dropped and you will hear the squelch burst as the receiver closes.

The most efficient and pleasing to the ears is to have the scanner detect the end code.
 

DaveH

Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2001
Messages
3,287
Location
Ottawa, Ont.
Well, since these are not "real" radios we are talking about, what
happens if interference knocks out the end code...so you're sitting
on an idle voice channel waiting for the next transmission. Besides
maybe some of us (no accounting for taste) like that squelch tail.

Dave
 

exkalibur

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
2,920
Location
York, Ontario
Well, you would think Uniden would have had the foresight for that. On a Motorola radio, if for whatever reason it doesn't detect an end-code, when it stops hearing the low speed data on the voice channel, it assumes it didn't hear the end-code, and returns to the control channel. Uniden radios are already capable of watching for the low speed trunking data, so why not just use that as an indicator of a terminated transmission?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top