Why Aren't CB Radio Frequencies Added To The DB?

Status
Not open for further replies.

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
16,601
Reaction score
15,381
Location
BEE00
Because there is nothing unique about locally used CB frequencies to distinguish them from the standard 40 channel plan. AM is AM, there are no squelch tones (aka PL/DPL), nor are they required to be licensed.

MURS and FRS are different, as they normally use PL/DPL tones to distinguish them.

The RRDB was never really intended to deal with frequencies below 30 MHz, only a few exceptions have been made, and those exceptions require some form of uniqueness to them.

RRDB Included Data

RRDB Excluded Data

"Frequencies between 25-30 MHz may be included in the database provided they are specifically used for typical land mobile-type operations, in a mode commonly used by land mobile users (FM, NFM, P25, etc)."
 

KC3ECJ

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
615
Reaction score
307
Because there is nothing unique about locally used CB frequencies to distinguish them from the standard 40 channel plan. AM is AM, there are no squelch tones (aka PL/DPL), nor are they required to be licensed.

MURS and FRS are different, as they normally use PL/DPL tones to distinguish them.

The RRDB was never really intended to deal with frequencies below 30 MHz, only a few exceptions have been made, and those exceptions require some form of uniqueness to them.

RRDB Included Data

RRDB Excluded Data

"Frequencies between 25-30 MHz may be included in the database provided they are specifically used for typical land mobile-type operations, in a mode commonly used by land mobile users (FM, NFM, P25, etc)."

So what about airband then?
GMRS, at least previously, was authorized by the FCC for AM.

And 26-27mhz CB just got authorization for FM by the FCC.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
16,601
Reaction score
15,381
Location
BEE00
So what about airband then?
GMRS, at least previously, was authorized by the FCC for AM.

And 26-27mhz CB just got authorization for FM by the FCC.
Airband is above 30 MHz, right? Did you read through the Database Administrator Handbook that I linked?

The standard 40 channel CB plan is already included in the nationwide listings, that's good enough for now. When and if FM modulation becomes a thing with business CB users such as your local landfills, we'll cross that bridge. Otherwise, asked and answered.
 

trentbob

W3BUX- Bucks County, PA
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
6,929
Reaction score
8,192
Check this link.
Which is under Nationwide systems in the database. KC3ECJ... when you monitor the database on your radio you have the option of selecting Nationwide systems and toggling them on and off such as the Citizens Band.
 

KC3ECJ

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
615
Reaction score
307
you mean like this?
No.
I mean my submission of frequencies used by landfills in Lackawanna County Pennsylvania.
Airband is above 30 MHz, right? Did you read through the Database Administrator Handbook that I linked?

The standard 40 channel CB plan is already included in the nationwide listings, that's good enough for now. When and if FM modulation becomes a thing with business CB users such as your local landfills, we'll cross that bridge. Otherwise, asked and answered.
So what if CB is below 30mhz? Why is AM not cool if it is below 30mhz?
 

KC3ECJ

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
615
Reaction score
307
ummm...
There's specific air band info by county.
Why can't there be specific business usage of CB by county?

Why does something having a squelch tone or not have any bearing when the most common MURS user, Walmart, usually has it in CSQ?

Or what aboou Delesa Regional School District (Franklinville) here says:
"District using non-standard DPL tones on certian channels (Marked as CSQ). These non-standard DPLs can not be programmed into current scanners. See Wiki page for full listing LINK"
Sure those non-standard DPLs are in the wiki, but they're using GMRS/FRS.
 

Whiskey3JMC

Another Pesky Scanist
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
9,890
Reaction score
8,488
Location
Simulcastylvania, TE
Why does something having a squelch tone or not have any bearing when the most common MURS user, Walmart, usually has it in CSQ?
Walmarts have migrated (or are in the process of migrating) away from MURS. Further discussion on that here. My local Walmart switched to spread spectrum which can't be tracked by scanner. Oh well, can't monitor stockroom checks anymore, tough loss
 

KC3ECJ

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
615
Reaction score
307
Walmarts have migrated (or are in the process of migrating) away from MURS. Further discussion on that here. My local Walmart switched to spread spectrum which can't be tracked by scanner. Oh well, can't monitor stockroom checks anymore, tough loss
I used DTRs when I was at Macy's, but they were not used often.
 

Whiskey3JMC

Another Pesky Scanist
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
9,890
Reaction score
8,488
Location
Simulcastylvania, TE
Or what aboou Delesa Regional School District (Franklinville) here says:
"District using non-standard DPL tones on certian channels (Marked as CSQ). These non-standard DPLs can not be programmed into current scanners. See Wiki page for full listing LINK"
The following is explained in the wiki link you provided...
District using non-standard DPL tones on certain channels (Marked as CSQ in the RR Database). These non-standard DPLs are available in various Chinese import two way radios. However they cannot be programmed into any current scanners.
 

KC3ECJ

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
615
Reaction score
307
The following is explained in the wiki link you provided...
District using non-standard DPL tones on certain channels (Marked as CSQ in the RR Database). These non-standard DPLs are available in various Chinese import two way radios. However they cannot be programmed into any current scanners.
So the list still won't auto load these tones to scanners, and will be listed as CSQ.
So how is this not a problem but CB is?

CB, MURS, and FRS can all be used more or less the same for 2 way voice despite being different bands.

Fire/EMS dispatch is often CSQ, not a problem?

There's also data channels throughout the DB, usually a scanner by itself can't do much or anything with these, but they're listed.
 

belvdr

No longer interested in living
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
2,567
Reaction score
1,653
There's also data channels throughout the DB, usually a scanner by itself can't do much or anything with these, but they're listed.
Are you referring to the various P25 frequencies that aren't listed as control channels? If so, I believe that some systems can use any of those frequencies as a control channel. A radio admin can correct me if I'm wrong.
 

KC3ECJ

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
615
Reaction score
307
Are you referring to the various P25 frequencies that aren't listed as control channels? If so, I believe that some systems can use any of those frequencies as a control channel. A radio admin can correct me if I'm wrong.
Stuff like mobile data terminals and telemetry.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
16,601
Reaction score
15,381
Location
BEE00
You seem to be purposely ignoring the fact that I clearly stated that the RRDB was never intended to catalog frequencies below 30 MHz, except for a few specific exceptions such as 10 meter ham radio. CB is not one of those exceptions, save for the nationwide listing of the standard 40 channel plan. The other examples you keep bringing up are >30 MHz, and therefore have no relevance to this discussion.
 

KevinC

32D2T/957.282
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
14,107
Reaction score
22,597
Location
I'm everywhere Focker!
You seem to be purposely ignoring the fact that I clearly stated that the RRDB was never intended to catalog frequencies below 30 MHz, except for a few specific exceptions such as 10 meter ham radio. CB is not one of those exceptions, save for the nationwide listing of the standard 40 channel plan. The other examples you keep bringing up are >30 MHz, and therefore have no relevance to this discussion.

But why aren't CB frequencies in the database?
 

KC3ECJ

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
615
Reaction score
307
You seem to be purposely ignoring the fact that I clearly stated that the RRDB was never intended to catalog frequencies below 30 MHz, except for a few specific exceptions such as 10 meter ham radio. CB is not one of those exceptions, save for the nationwide listing of the standard 40 channel plan. The other examples you keep bringing up are >30 MHz, and therefore have no relevance to this discussion.

And the rationale for this is what?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top