• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

BCD536HP: WOW!-Sensitivity of 536 vs HP-2

Status
Not open for further replies.

popnokick

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
1,867
Location
Northeast PA
#1
Well, I landed a BCD536 on an Amazon Lightning Deal.. and I also have an HP-2 that is a year old. Not crazy about the tiny display on the 536, especially since it will be replacing a BCT15 in my vehicle. But I disconnected my HP-2 from the antenna in the house (an OCFD in the attic) and connected the 536. Oh my goodness! In the VHF Hi band the 536 is MUCH more sensitive, based upon the number of NOAA weather transmitters that I can receive. With the the HP-2 I was getting 2-3 NOAA transmitters depending on propagation. With the 536 I receive 5-6 NOAA transmitters, with the more distant ones holding the squelch open no problem. So everything I've read here on RR about the 536 being a hot receiver is true... at least compared to the HP-2.
 

Timmeh-31

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
64
Location
Syracuse, NY
#2
Nice, congrats! I nearly snagged that rig during the lightning sale, but I got cold feet and almost immediately regretted it. A couple days later, I found a deal on the BCD996P2, and it wasn't a bad consolation prize at all. It has "ears" for days, even with the stock antenna on it.

Grats again on your new toy, and Merry Christmas! :)
 

rabrol

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
196
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
#3
Well, I landed a BCD536 on an Amazon Lightning Deal...
Oh my goodness! In the VHF Hi band the 536 is MUCH more sensitive, based upon the number of NOAA weather transmitters that I can receive. With the the HP-2 I was getting 2-3 NOAA transmitters depending on propagation.
That's good to know. I managed to snag the lightning deal too. Will be happy to have a high performance receiver when it arrives in about a week :)
 

N2MWE

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 30, 2001
Messages
2,439
Location
People's Republic of New York
#8
I like my HP2...but the 536 has a very hot receiver. I had fun with that radio driving back and forth to Wisconsin. Best part is that even though the receiver is hot, I got NO crossmod whatsoever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top