To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:
Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.
If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.
To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.
The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.
For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).
This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.
GMRS low power repeater on a 30 foot tower.
No specific brand.
Objective:
Get communication from roughly a 5-7 mile radius on each end of a 20 mile separation.
What is your end goal by using both antennas? It *can* be done but there are so many variables for patterns and phasing issues it may not accomplish what you want to do.
What is your end goal by using both antennas? It *can* be done but there are so many variables for patterns and phasing issues it may not accomplish what you want to do.
If you split your feedline to two different antennas you immediately loose at least 50% of your signal to or from each antenna. If you have a 6dB gain omni then it becomes the equivalent of a 3dBgain and a 10dB gain Yagi will become a 7dB gain Yagi. If you were to split the feedline to two identical antennas spaced the precise required distance apart you could get up to 3dB gain in the process. But your using two completely different antennas with random spacing.
In doing this with the antennas you have not only will you loose at least 50% of your signal by splitting, there is a good chance you will loose more signal due to each antenna receive or transmitting a signal out of phase with the other antenna, which will cancel out some signal with the worst being if the antennas are the exact distance apart to cause a 180deg phase reversal and you get basically no signal.
With this info you can decide if you want to combine the antennas.
If you split your feedline to two different antennas you immediately loose at least 50% of your signal to or from each antenna. If you have a 6dB gain omni then it becomes the equivalent of a 3dBgain and a 10dB gain Yagi will become a 7dB gain Yagi. If you were to split the feedline to two identical antennas spaced the precise required distance apart you could get up to 3dB gain in the process. But your using two completely different antennas with random spacing.
In doing this with the antennas you have not only will you loose at least 50% of your signal by splitting, there is a good chance you will loose more signal due to each antenna receive or transmitting a signal out of phase with the other antenna, which will cancel out some signal with the worst being if the antennas are the exact distance apart to cause a 180deg phase reversal and you get basically no signal.
With this info you can decide if you want to combine the antennas.
Sounds like you want an elliptical antenna pattern.
Stacked, folded dipoles should be able to give you the desired results. You can find the details on several other, recent, threads, but don't skimp on the hardware!
I have no idea what you're doing here. Your posts are not clear at all. If I'm reading this correctly, you have two repeater sites that are separated by 20 miles, you want to link them together, and get 5-7 mile coverage from each repeater?
If that's the case, then use a microwave link or such to link the repeaters together, assuming you can't do an internet link.
I'm thinking its simply two stations about 20mi apart using a repeater and they want 5-7mi simplex around each base station. Depending on the terrain all that's needed for that is a good omni like 6dBd gain up high at each base station and a high gain like 8-10dBd gain stick on the repeater and its high enough to reach the base stations. That part of Florida is really flat so its going to be big gain antennas and tall masts and a repeater on a tall building or with a very tall tower.
I have no idea what you're doing here. Your posts are not clear at all. If I'm reading this correctly, you have two repeater sites that are separated by 20 miles, you want to link them together, and get 5-7 mile coverage from each repeater?
If that's the case, then use a microwave link or such to link the repeaters together, assuming you can't do an internet link.
Pay attention to your rules. Repeater to repeater links would be considered a fixed station and limited to 15W power output (95.1767 a 2), and would also have to use one of the allowed frequencies for the link. You could link the repeaters with the internet, if you knew how.