• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

You do realize the end is near, right? (Conventional and trunked radio)

Status
Not open for further replies.

pinballwiz86

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
1,569
Location
Missouri
The end has been near for a long time in the scanning hobby! If you were around when the first trunked systems came out, the end was near! If you were around when the first digital P25 came out? The end was near!

The end came to our friends in England though. TETRA killed the hobby for them.
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,638
Location
Sector 001
Digital is crap in environments with wind and noisy machinery.

It is also problematic for security and other emergency personnel in a fire situation.
Security needs a simplex analog option.

Not with modern DSP and active noise cancelling technologies.
 
D

DaveNF2G

Guest
Yeah, I will put my scanners and SDRs on the trash heap with the newspapers and books. smh
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,638
Location
Sector 001
Most modern rigs. My NX200 does extremely well in high noise using NXDN, XPR radios, with recent firmware, and noise cancelling speaker mics as well. The APX series portables use dual microphones with DSP, not a Harris user, but likely the XG series use something similar. Kenwood offers active noise cancelling speaker Mics for the modern TK/NX portables that use the multi pin connector. This is not the infancy of P25, with Astro Sabers and XTS3000 radios any more. Noise reduction has come a very long way since even the XTS5000/2500/1500 series hit the market.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

12dbsinad

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,953
WiFi? Microcells? 300 mw subscriber units? Sure, it'll work in cities. Until the word "mission critical" comes into play, like down in Houston where those microcells would be under water, and there IS NO reliable infrastructure left running.

You can have all kinds of fancy gadgets, but when your voice communications is gone, dead, not happening, and you can't switch channels on your high power mobile/portable and talk simplex, decisions change real quick.

Technology is great, but it is really hard to beat LMR.
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,234
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
Sure, it'll work in cities. Until the word "mission critical" comes into play, like down in Houston where those microcells would be under water, and there IS NO reliable infrastructure left running.

Well, I hear that Houston's prime site went under water. So, how does that fare when you're prime/master site gets disabled? You get failsoft, or nothing at all.

Anything under water is hosed. No brainer. Even those Randy Rescue ARES folks are dead in the water (no joke) when infrastructure is full of water. Ham repeaters hose up just as well as a GTR8000 six pack stack or a Huawei LTE base radio (though the wide adaptation of RRUs being tower top mounted sure does make them safe from water).

You can have all kinds of fancy gadgets, but when your voice communications is gone, dead, not happening, and you can't switch channels on your high power mobile/portable and talk simplex, decisions change real quick.

Technology is great, but it is really hard to beat LMR.

I've been listening to Zello talk groups including "Texas Search and Rescue Non-Medical Emergency" for a few hours. Guess what, it's working as well if not better than most LMR is. No one has keyed up with any BER filled transmissions, voice quality far exceeds any narrow band LMR, and the cost is...wait for it...FREE.

Are there cell sites down. Yup. But IP routing and mutliple networks are handling it. No $100,000 rip off overpriced ISSI routers needed at every stinking site or $500 a piece license fees for subscribers or talk groups.

LMR the way it is being sold today needs to evolve or it will be done. The writing is on the wall.
 

12dbsinad

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,953
Well, I hear that Houston's prime site went under water. So, how does that fare when you're prime/master site gets disabled? You get failsoft, or nothing at all.

Anything under water is hosed. No brainer. Even those Randy Rescue ARES folks are dead in the water (no joke) when infrastructure is full of water. Ham repeaters hose up just as well as a GTR8000 six pack stack or a Huawei LTE base radio (though the wide adaptation of RRUs being tower top mounted sure does make them safe from water).

I think you are missing my point. Obviously, bad things happen when any part of a system is full of water.. I was trying to compare the solely based infrastructure dependent "solutions of the future" to something that can still work without, which in this case is LMR. You would be surprised on how many rescue teams are using nationwide tac channels/simplex , in Texas.




LMR the way it is being sold today needs to evolve or it will be done. The writing is on the wall.

But you can't blame the technology for this. If you think LTE will "fill the gap" for reliability for mission critical voice comms, you've got another thing coming..
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,877
Is that true, Houston prime site down?

It has always bugged me that simulcast systems rely on a central control point. With P25 , GPS and IP, the voting and simulcast functions could all be distributed. No need for a prime site. I have mentioned this to Harris and Motorola systems engineers in the past and I think they missed my point. There seems to be this concept of "control" that the manufacturers dislike any concept where the remote sites are too capable.

The current simulcast architectures are too fragile in that respect.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

com501

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
1,617
Location
127.0.0.1
This is why I have 100w radios in my truck out here in Nevada, and an Iridium mobile unit. 100+ miles on some roads with NO services, NO cellular, and mostly, no other traffic for hours at a time. Oh yeah, and out here, that site you need to talk on is 50 or more miles away, line of sight.
 

cg

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2000
Messages
4,601
Location
Connecticut
The end is near with "near" being a relative term. Near as in dinosaurs, yep, blink of an eye. Near as in how long 2 way radio has been around? Nope, long way away. Unless Uncle Sam hands out a lot more money, it will be decades before there is widespread use of LTE for public safety voice communications.

If you compare it to the 800 MHz rebanding "3 year" project, here we are 10 years past that projected completion date and still not done, I figure if they run the LTE project the same way, it will be 30 years or so before my Uniden Trunktracker 15 is no good.

chris
 

KC3ECJ

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
512
This is why I have 100w radios in my truck out here in Nevada, and an Iridium mobile unit. 100+ miles on some roads with NO services, NO cellular, and mostly, no other traffic for hours at a time. Oh yeah, and out here, that site you need to talk on is 50 or more miles away, line of sight.

Low band vhf is still a good option for rural departments wit little or no infrastructure but not many manufacturers want to support that now.
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,638
Location
Sector 001
Low band vhf is still a good option for rural departments wit little or no infrastructure but not many manufacturers want to support that now.


Except that low band portables have dummy loads for antennas...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top