Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Software > Trunking Control Channel Decoding


Trunking Control Channel Decoding For discussion of installation, setup, configuration, and use of the Trunker / Unitrunker digital decoding utilities (for decoding Trunking control channels)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2009, 07:20 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philaphila Metro Area.
Posts: 45
Default Trunking Monitor S/w

Does anyone know a good windows based Trucking decoder software ? I have used trunker for years and wanted to try to get away from the dos based software. Thanks Bob

The software will be used to monitor a type II smart zone 800 MHz system
__________________
Xts5000 Model 3 With encrpt
Astro Spectras
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2009, 07:44 PM
Wiki Admin
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Glen Burnie, Md.
Posts: 8,957
Default

See the links in this article (blue text is a link) - to a certain extent, it varies depending on what scanner you are using...

Trunked Radio Decoders - The RadioReference Wiki

73 Mike
__________________
links editor, Utility Monitoring Central
Wiki Administrator, HF Forum moderator, RadioReference
Friends don't let friends buy Scancat Lite Plus!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2009, 09:03 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philaphila Metro Area.
Posts: 45
Default

Thanks, Now i'm using a mcs2000 with a slicer.
__________________
Xts5000 Model 3 With encrpt
Astro Spectras
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2009, 02:05 AM
joescanner's Avatar
Just another radio geek.
 
Database Admin

Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Gresham, OR
Posts: 413
Default

Lose the slicer and use audio decoding. You still need the baseband audio out but the decoding is 100% more reliable (in my own experience) with the audio decoders as opposed to the slicer/serial decoders.
__________________
Joseph Stein, KD7MLG
RadioReference Database Administrator for Oregon and Washington State
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2009, 10:09 PM
ve3tej's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 80
Send a message via MSN to ve3tej
Default

Trunk88 is one of the best software out there for decoding Motorola systems. There is a yahoo group for support and the software can be downloaded here.
Index of /~phoenix/wap/TRUNK88
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2009, 08:29 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MotoSystemsTech View Post
Thanks, Now i'm using a mcs2000 with a slicer.
That radio should be able to directly drive a sound card line input. Just make yourself a shielded cable.


Quote:
Originally Posted by joescanner View Post
decoding is 100% more reliable (in my own experience) with the audio decoders as opposed to the slicer/serial decoders.
Sound card based decoders can do a far better job than slicers (e.g. filter noise and compensate for non-linear responses, etc.) if the audio is properly coupled to the PC's audio input.

A direct connection (or the near direct connection that a 10k resistor provides) from a tap point to a mic input will overdrive the PC's audio stages and reduce the effectiveness of filtering software. Lack of a DC blocker putting mic driver voltage back into the scanner is another no-no.

A direct connection from a tap point to a PC's line input can put an excessive (600 ohm) load on a scanner's audio detector stage and lead to signal distortion. The high load pretty much guarantees that there will be poor low frequency response issues.

With simple two level signals (like Moto 3600 bps CCs), mediocre audio coupling generally isn't a problem as long as you're monitoring strong local signals. But when the static and other noises increase, a dicey audio link will surely lead to lower than necessary decoding rates.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New to scanners and trunking JWTL General Scanning Forum 3 05-16-2007 05:19 PM
New to trunking and scanners JWTL Trunking Forum 1 05-16-2007 05:18 PM
New to trunking - PLEASE HELP!! nopicowboy Kentucky Radio Discussion Forum 4 10-29-2005 10:52 PM
939.4250 NFM Trunking CC??? whooey General Scanning Forum 2 07-22-2005 07:25 PM
BC246T Trunking Not Working (ONLY), Very Odd Condition! ppmd Uniden Scanners 9 07-13-2005 01:42 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions