|
|
|
|
| Trunking Control Channel Decoding For discussion of installation, setup, configuration, and use of the Trunker / Unitrunker digital decoding utilities (for decoding Trunking control channels) |

10-05-2009, 01:10 PM
|
|
Seņor Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,429
|
|
Unitrunker 1.0.0.8
This release contains two small fixes for downloading from the RR DB SOAP interface.
1. LTR talkgroups were mangled.
2. P25 site numbers were also mangled.
More to come later.
|

10-05-2009, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 199
|
|
Thanks for your hard work on this!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unitrunker
This release contains two small fixes for downloading from the RR DB SOAP interface.
1. LTR talkgroups were mangled.
2. P25 site numbers were also mangled.
More to come later.
|
|

10-05-2009, 08:11 PM
|
|
Seņor Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,429
|
|
Gah. Forgot the link.
Unitrunker
|

10-06-2009, 09:00 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Beckley, WV
Posts: 364
|
|
Not that I really need it but the band plan on my apco 25 system is not displaying. I think when I was on 1.0.0.7 it did on the first tower then quit. On 8 I can not get it to display anything.
|

10-06-2009, 09:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MS Gulf Coast
Posts: 153
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wvscanner
Not that I really need it but the band plan on my apco 25 system is not displaying. I think when I was on 1.0.0.7 it did on the first tower then quit. On 8 I can not get it to display anything.
|
Yep confirmed here as well. It is being decoded and stored in the XML but not being displayed on the band plan tab.
Also.....The download of of a P25 system adds/duplicates previously decoded channels with meaningless LCN's that are sequentially numbered 00-0001, 00-0002, etc. to the list of already decoded channels.
Good job on the site dowloads though, seems that is all good now. 
|

10-06-2009, 09:58 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Strathroy, Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,561
|
|
Anyone else having trouble with drop down boxes in menus? I just grabbed 1.0.0.8 and fired it up. First thing I tried to do is add a receiver but I can't get the drop down box to open so I can select Signal or Voice. Double clicking/clicking the down arrow on the right of the box has no effect. The machine I'm using is currently running Win2k.
Edit: Disregard... Got it to work. I wasn't clicking on the very first drop down box first... I was skipping ahead to the Signal/Voice option.
Edit #2 - How do I import all my data from UT Retro? Or can I? I've been monitoring a local system for quite some time and *really* don't want to have to re-enter all the user data manually.
Thanks!!!
__________________
Pro-106 - Pro-96 - BCT15 - BC780XLT - Pro-433 - Pro-2045 - BC-350 - Pro-43
Last edited by Forts; 10-06-2009 at 10:47 PM..
|

10-06-2009, 11:49 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Strathroy, Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,561
|
|
I also seem to be seeing some weird things with EDACS patches. With the Retro/DOS versions my patches would always be up in the 1600/1700/1800 ranges, but 1.0.0.8 is showing them in the 600's and 700's. Anyone else notice any EDACS patch discrepancies?
__________________
Pro-106 - Pro-96 - BCT15 - BC780XLT - Pro-433 - Pro-2045 - BC-350 - Pro-43
|

10-07-2009, 12:32 AM
|
|
|
I downloaded 1.0.0.8......checked the version after download. It says it's still 1.0.0.7
__________________
PSR-500 / PSREdit500 / Pro96Com / Unitrunker
|

10-07-2009, 12:48 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Middlesex County
Posts: 1,112
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forts
I also seem to be seeing some weird things with EDACS patches. With the Retro/DOS versions my patches would always be up in the 1600/1700/1800 ranges, but 1.0.0.8 is showing them in the 600's and 700's. Anyone else notice any EDACS patch discrepancies?
|
Now that you say that, was something i was going to say too.. I noticed the same thing just forgot to post about it
__________________
Capt.Muxlow
RS 2051 2036 2040
Uniden 396T, 296D
M\A Com & Motorola's
|

10-07-2009, 07:35 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Beckley, WV
Posts: 364
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forts
Edit #2 - How do I import all my data from UT Retro? Or can I? I've been monitoring a local system for quite some time and *really* don't want to have to re-enter all the user data manually.
Thanks!!!
|
The way I did it was copy all the files over from retro to the gui folder. I used 1.0.0.5 to import the files to the system. Then exit and started 1.0.0.8 and they were in the list.
|

10-07-2009, 12:25 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Strathroy, Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,561
|
|
Good to know! I will give that a try. Thanks!!
__________________
Pro-106 - Pro-96 - BCT15 - BC780XLT - Pro-433 - Pro-2045 - BC-350 - Pro-43
|

10-08-2009, 10:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 103
|
|
Priority?
Is there a particular reason why Priority (min of TG pri and Rad pri) isn't an available column for display? When I'm adjusting priorities, it's nice to see what the other active conversations are at.
Flash
|

10-08-2009, 11:21 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forts
I also seem to be seeing some weird things with EDACS patches. With the Retro/DOS versions my patches would always be up in the 1600/1700/1800 ranges, but 1.0.0.8 is showing them in the 600's and 700's. Anyone else notice any EDACS patch discrepancies?
|
Actually now that y'all are saying you're seeing this, I feel less crazy. In my area, there is a patch from the local Sheriff's Office VHF system to a wide area 900 MHz EDACS. The talkgroup assigned to this patch is 1369, but on Unitrunker it keeps coming up as talkgroup 345(which has already been assigned on this system to something else). The previous version I was using(1.0.0.5) displayed this correctly I know.
__________________
(+)-3-methoxy-17-methyl-(9α,13α,14α)-morphinan
BC350C, IC-R7000, PRO-95, PRO-96, PRO-197, PSR-500
FT-7800R, Racal 25's, LPE-200's, Jaguar 725M
|

10-08-2009, 11:33 PM
|
|
|
still not getting the band plan to work Rick
__________________
Monty N Haynes
|

10-11-2009, 11:14 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SE Sask.
Posts: 182
|
|
I downloaded 1.8 , opened it with 7zip , added a descriminator tap to my BC250 and tuned it to 860.0625 MHz .The local EDACS control channel. I love the new Unitrunker, it works great. Thank you !
__________________
Trunk tracking Sask.Public Safety P25 system with Win500/PSR600C and Pro96com/PSR500C and trunk tracking FleetNet 800 EDAC system with BC250/BC780XLT. Scanning everything else with an Icom R10.
|

10-11-2009, 04:02 PM
|
|
|
Working well with the downloads from RR. However, its not showing TGIDs that are not on the RR database though, but the older version shows these TGIDs that are apparently only for today's edacs system testing on the Hillsborough County (Florida) east site. Is there a box to check/uncheck for this functionality?
|

10-18-2009, 05:37 PM
|
|
|
I too have noticed some strange talkgroups and odd handling of higher fleet number talkgroups. Talkgroups in the 12 and 15 range (Beach Patrol and Patches/Mutual Aid for Volusia County) show up as lower fleet numbers. I've also found fleet number 08 showing as 0 when in fleet viewing mode. I'm guessing this is a bug in taking the hex data and parsing it to fleet notation? Also decimal notation was not matching with previous data... I know Volusia County didn't rework their entire system.
-Mike
|

10-19-2009, 05:37 AM
|
|
|
Same here
15-xxx is showing as 7-xxx
|

10-20-2009, 10:20 PM
|
|
Seņor Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,429
|
|
Scratching my head. I don't remember changing anything in this area of the program. I'll check this out.
|

10-20-2009, 11:22 PM
|
|
|
I've got two different EDACS systems with the same problem happening(both are patches to a conventional system):
Talkgroup 1369 is showing up as 345 on one system, and talkgroup 1561 is showing up as 537 on the other. The difference between both of these talkgroup variations is a value of "1024." Just some examples to help you determine what the cause is.
__________________
(+)-3-methoxy-17-methyl-(9α,13α,14α)-morphinan
BC350C, IC-R7000, PRO-95, PRO-96, PRO-197, PSR-500
FT-7800R, Racal 25's, LPE-200's, Jaguar 725M
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 PM.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|