Quote:
Originally Posted by rkorchensky
If I look at the scope on the Pro-2040 the pattern is about 1/2" in height.
|
That's 1/6 or about 17% deflection - which is quite adequate. With 16 bit sampling, there is more than sufficient resolution.
Quote:
|
If I look at the scope on the Pro-2004 the pattern is higher than the window....about 3 1/4" in height. It is flattening at the top and bottom.
|
That's not good - you'll want to adjust that down. Ideally you should keep the signal inside the sampling range of the audio input. Motorola and EDACS waveforms are such that some clipping is tolerated. This will however destroy P25 decoding.
Quote:
|
My question is this.....is either pattern correct or are both wrong. Is a small pattern ok? I am assuming the large pattern is too large.
|
A small pattern is okay. If you want to decode P25 on the 2004, you'll need to reduce the signal level slightly.
Quote:
|
Would some form of capacitor or resistor in series with the Disc Tap help? What type and size?
|
A capacitor is redundant - your computer's sound input already has one. A resistor may help. They're cheap so you can buy several to see which is best. Start with a 47k resistor and go up or down from there.