djmt99 said:I'm hearing at least 3 of the trailing EDACS beeps. It tracks fine, but those beeps can get annoying.
EDIT: I see what's happening. I'll get the EDACS beeps until the next person in the transmission picks up the conversation. This is understandable, but quite annoying. Any ways around this?
Yikes. I have no idea why it's doing that ... I'll see what I can find.FLANO said:a picture is worth thousand words, as the saying goes....
Yes ... but the program would have to be monitoring the voice channel at the time the beeps occur to detect and mute them. That implies a single radio setup where the radio supports computer control and provides discriminator audio. That combined / integrated capability is not yet available. You would also lose true priority scan but that's the price you pay for keeping your sanity.djmt99 said:Is there a way to implement a "mute" function to cap the voice channel at the end of the actual tranmission before the trailing system beeps pick up?
I'm just now getting to that (testing scanner control on Windows 9X/ME) plus a few other things.bonus1331 said:Any chance you had an opportunity to work on the below?
Sure. I need to scrape together a list of changes. Most significant was mentioned above - fleetmap support. If you use this feature (and I've done my job right) you won't notice a thing. Some other changes ... EDACS tweaks, fixes for controlling Icom PCR radios (like those $50 puppies on eBay). I need to run some proposed changes up the flagpole to get some priorities on what to chase next.bonus1331 said:I'm at work and will download tonight, but can you give an idea on what's been updated?
I posted about the same problem with MPT1327 systems and 0.1.0.40 here.so a picture is worth a thousand words, as the saying goes....
rfmobile said:Someone wrote a program called "GE-Ease" some time ago that filters out the beeps - might provide some interim relief.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when those beeps start, don't the late entry announcements on the control channel stop? Couldn't you have a (possibly user-defined) timeout value that would force the voice receiver to mute/park when the late entries stop? I'm not suggesting they could be completely muted, just limited to one or two. If you're already doing this, please disregard.rfmobile said:Yes ... but the program would have to be monitoring the voice channel at the time the beeps occur to detect and mute them. That implies a single radio setup where the radio supports computer control and provides discriminator audio. That combined / integrated capability is not yet available. You would also lose true priority scan but that's the price you pay for keeping your sanity.
I can't find it. Perhaps someone has a copy of this roughly 10 year old freeware program.djmt99 said:Any idea on where to find this? I see that it was brought up in the 4th beta thread, but no reference. Are you sure that this is the correct spelling/name? I searched through RR and Google and didn't find a thing! I'm very interested in trying it out.
FLANO said:Rick,
Here is a snapshot of the logged systems screen from 0_1_0_38 and 0_1_0_41. Perhaps I didn't clearly explain what I saw differently, so a picture is worth thousand words, as the saying goes....
Is this by design not to see the logged systems that have been previously worked?
For you, FLANO, and comint ... this has been found and fixed for the next release. If you use the "Path=" feature in the CFG file, you will definitely see this problem. Next release will also fix a problem affecting a very tiny number of EDACS systems.wise871 said:Was there ever a fix for this?
You just described the call progress timer. Giving the users an adjustable inter-message call timer - perhaps on a per protocol basis - would be ideal. So far no one has asked for this so I haven't bothered.slicerwizard said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but when those beeps start, don't the late entry announcements on the control channel stop? Couldn't you have a (possibly user-defined) timeout value that would force the voice receiver to mute/park when the late entries stop? I'm not suggesting they could be completely muted, just limited to one or two. If you're already doing this, please disregard.