RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners and Receivers Forums > Uniden Forums > Uniden Future Designs

Uniden Future Designs For discussion of upcoming models, wish lists or all other topics on possible designs or features.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2014, 7:26 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 837
Default Mixed Mode.

Can we please have mixed mode on a scanner for agencies that use a mix of Analog and Digital.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2014, 8:07 AM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,340
Default

We do! Or at least I do. My old PSR-800 will, when set to Auto, id the modulation and apply the proper decode/demod. Works very well too.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2014, 8:38 AM
UPMan's Avatar
Uniden Representative
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 8,591
Default

I'm not clear on the request. All our digital scanners will scan Motorola P16 mixed analog/digital systems.
__________________
Uniden Product Ninja
Who is UpMan and why doesn't he answer my email/phone call?
Professional Scanner Developer
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2014, 9:00 AM
KevinC's Avatar
Moderator
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 1,247
Default

I'm going to take a WAG and say he means conventional. As is stands you would have to program the frequency twice (assuming you want to use PL/DPL and NAC).

I have an agency like that and it's annoying.

You can try zero delay but if they respond in the same mode you may resume scanning before the reply. If you have a delay and they respond in the "other" mode you may miss part of the reply.
__________________
BC-210XLT

"Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something."
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2014, 1:15 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 172
Default

Agreed, there's no reason the scanner can't check both NAC and CTCSS/DCS. Even if it does check one before the other, it will still be fast, and much better than two channels with no delay.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2014, 1:22 PM
KevinC's Avatar
Moderator
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 1,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashP View Post
Agreed, there's no reason the scanner can't check both NAC and CTCSS/DCS. Even if it does check one before the other, it will still be fast, and much better than two channels with no delay.
While that would be nice, the downside would be the chance of missing the first part of a transmission while the radio decides whether it's analog or digital.

And slower scan times as the radio would have to check for both a NAC and PL/DPL match on mixed-mode channels.
__________________
BC-210XLT

"Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something."
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2014, 1:56 PM
Mentor
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,175
Default

One partial "work-around" would be to use zero delay on the system, but use a one or two second hold. With the channel programmed "both ways", one entry analog, with the PL tone or DCS code, and the other entry digital, with NAC code, both modes are covered. Your "delay" is covered by the system hold time, instead of the individual channel delay.

I do much the same thing on Texas DPS where base transmissions are on one frequency, but mobiles are transmitting on an entirely different one. The bases are not often set to "repeater" mode, where both sides of the conversation are heard. In the more rural areas, where mobile repeaters are used, you do hear both on the same frequency, so a delay would work.
__________________
Steve
BCD536HP-BCD436HP-BCD396XT(2)-Home Patrol 1(E)-PSR500-BCD396T-BCD996T-BR330T-BC250D-BC780XLT
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-22-2014, 7:22 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UPMan View Post
I'm not clear on the request. All our digital scanners will scan Motorola P16 mixed analog/digital systems.
I have an SO that uses both analog and digital. State agency uses Analog Conventional on the channel and county SO replies on Digital Conventional. All radios have mixed mode so they can hear it.

They'll use the Example Freq of 155.123 PL 110 and 155.123 NAC 731

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinC View Post
While that would be nice, the downside would be the chance of missing the first part of a transmission while the radio decides whether it's analog or digital.

And slower scan times as the radio would have to check for both a NAC and PL/DPL match on mixed-mode channels.
I already miss quite a bit as it is. On a mixed mode channel it shouldn't take *too* long figuring it out. If you have a transmission on it, it should check for Analog PL you have set and then Digital PL you have set.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions