RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners and Receivers Forums > Uniden Forums > Uniden Prospective Owners

Uniden Prospective Owners A discussion area for those interested in purchasing specific models and have questions about them.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2014, 10:32 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tewksbury MA
Posts: 369
Default Would you purchase a new Uniden Scannner?

I think we should let Uniden know our opinions of the current scanners the have for sale.
__________________
.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2014, 10:40 PM
W8RMH's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 3,785
Default

There are hundreds of posts on this site doing that very thing.
__________________
BCD996XT BCD396XT BCT15X BCT15 Bearcat IV
Columbus Police Live Audio
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2014, 11:04 PM
Kingmobileaudio's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 630
Default

Yes I would... both of them.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2014, 11:20 PM
Jay911's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bragg Creek, Alberta
Posts: 6,682
Default

If I had the money to spend, I'd buy several right now.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2014, 11:54 PM
ratboy's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Posts: 390
Default

I wouldn't buy either of the new models, they are a train wreck, IMHO, but I wouldn't pass up a deal on a 396XT if I had some cash to spare.
__________________
Pro-2004, 2005, 96, 106, 197, PSR 500. Kenwood R1000, TS-850SAT. JRC NRD-525, Allied SX 190 (2, one works 100%), Yaesu FRG-7(2), Hammarlund HQ-100, Icom R71A (2), a few old CBs.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 1:37 AM
JackdAnderson's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: chula vista,california
Posts: 15
Default

Got a new 536hp on June 16 that has run 24/7 and have not had any problems at all. Also have a BC895xlt and no problems with that. I have had other Uniden scanners too and no problems so I'm pleased and Will buy more.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 1:51 AM
joeuser's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: North Central Kansas
Posts: 873
Default

I would
__________________
-HP-1,BCD436HP,996XT,396XT,396T,250D,BC780XLT(x2),UBC7 80XLT,Pro-197(x4),164(x2),2006,2001,42,37,21A|Trident TRX-100XLT|DX-440|UV-5R w/ NA-771(x2)|R820T(x2),UniTrunker,DSD+|DisCone(x2)&ST2@ ~1600ft
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 3:01 AM
pinballwiz86's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratboy View Post
I wouldn't buy either of the new models, they are a train wreck, IMHO, but I wouldn't pass up a deal on a 396XT if I had some cash to spare.
I got a 396XT a few months ago. An excellent scanner. I highly recommend it.
__________________
Scanners:
Uniden BC125AT // Uniden BCD396XT // Uniden BCT15X // GRE PSR-310
Amateur Radio:
Icom 718 // Baofeng UV-5R+ // Yaesu FT-2900R // Yaesu FT-7900R
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 4:43 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 570
Default

I got a 436HP and don't regret it. It's not perfect, but that doesn't mean it won't do what I bought it to do well.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 6:39 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cerritos, CA (LA County)
Posts: 342
Default

Have one 436HP and two 536HPs. Not perfect, some features missing, but best scanners that I have owned so far in terms of flexible programming, P25 decode quality, lots of information on screen, and built-in recording. I sometimes go back to my 396XT/PRO-106 and 996XT/PRO-197 (hardly ever to my HomePatrol) but always seem to come back to the new Unidens. I'm even thinking about purchasing another 436HP.
You can get away with analog scanners, non-trunking, ... in some areas nowadays. But for folks serious about digital trunking scanning, I believe they are the best thing available for the price.
Everyone keeps waiting for Whistler, but so far I just see 7 or 8 year-old PRO-106/PSR-500
and PRO-197/PSR-600 technology. And if the PSR-800 clone shows up, there is no way that will match up to the 436HP with all its flexibility.
Steve AA6IO
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 6:53 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Canada, Eh!
Posts: 375
Default

I bought a 436 and would do it over again. I would buy a 536 too if I had the cash. It's the nature of the beast to complain about issues we find but no scanner is perfect (either are the users lol.).

However it was/is a mistake by Uniden to take so long to enable the missing features. They are a key selling point to many people.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 7:02 AM
fourthhorseman's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: 553' Above Sea Level!
Posts: 1,420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jack103 View Post
I think we should let Uniden know our opinions of the current scanners the have for sale.
Yes.Ill be getting an X36 before Halloween,not sure which,handheld or base..As well as another PSR500..For the love of the 500s platform.

To me,and this is just my humble opinion..Having WIFI and a smartphone app is tantamount to buying a Porsche with a built in toaster oven. Then when the toaster oven is not working right dumping the entire car.

The analyze feature is a much different story. I could use that. But I also have SDR/Unitrunker/DSD to fall back on. But this feature seems like it should be taking priority to get out there over the App & wifi..Im my opinion.

Ive recently (10 months back) scooped the 396XT & 996XT and am happy,very happy with both.

The DMA was strange to adjust to coming from Object Oriented memory..But Its easy to adapt to.

In short,the failure to put out the radios with what was advertised as functioning,and the response or lack there of from uniden puzzles me. But they will get it right - eventually. And the success and quality of the 15X,996XT,396XT leave me with a good feeling.

Now,,If I bought a new RV/Motorhome and the oven,fridge and TV didnt work,,Then Id be steamed..
__________________
Yep..Got some radios..I can hear lotsa stuff...
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 7:13 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Palm Beach Co., FL
Posts: 24
Default Would I Purchase

Yes. I have three of them now, including a 536 that's a couple of months old and the 436 I got a few days ago. I find them to be good quality products and they work just fine for my purposes. I can live without the two missing features that comprise the bulk (though not all) of the complaints I see.

That said, I think Uniden may have to rethink what they promise in future models. I see no reason to think they won't after some of the negative feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 9:40 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 442
Default Would you purchase a new Uniden Scannner?

I have and I would. I own the BCD436HP and the BCD536HP and both are my primary scanners one in the car and one to carry. In the past I have had a real hard time picking up the Genesee County Simulcast system in Flint Michigan. I often thought it would be nice if we could get a scanner that would just cover one band like a 700-800MHz trunking scanner. Most of the traffic I listen to has all gone to 800MHz anyway. It would be more like the professional radios and maybe it would work better on simulcast systems and be less prone to front end overload and have better filtering. Well as far as I am concerned this is as close as we can get right now. The new Uniden scanners still picks up other bands (not as good as older scanners) but really excels in the 800MHz trunking using the RS 800MHz rubber duck.

I have been going to events in Flint Michigan for years and none of my other scanners ever did a very good job on simulcast but the 436HP just works. I hear every transmission loud and clear no matter my location in the county itís just awesome and I love it... Thanks Uniden you hit the nail on the head for me.

I still have my PSR-800 and I love it at home which I have a non-simulcast tower nearby. But when I am mobile in the car the 436HP is my only choice because we have so many cell towers that cause issues with my PSR-800 I leave it at home. I also have the 396XT at home and it works fine too but not when I head north into the simulcast areas again I leave it home.

Good Luck to all and I hope you're as lucky as me to find a scanner that works at your location.

Mike
__________________
kb8rvp
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:17 AM
N2MWE's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: People's Republic of New York
Posts: 1,854
Default

I would buy another 536 in a heartbeat. And I just might when I get back from vacation. Is it perfect? No. Does it do what I need it to do? YES. I had Mac problems but I have solved them once and for all. Both radios fire up nicely on VMWare. My 536 ride the dashboard with the GPS and my 436 is a constant companion. I have my 436 in front of me as I write this. My 996xt is at my desk. I am selling my last two Pro 197 radios.
__________________
Sic vis pacem, para bellum...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:20 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MACOMB, MI.
Posts: 501
Default

Yes. I just purchased the BCD436HP and I'm considering a BCD536HP. The current issues being discussed are not a concern for me. I wouldn't use the features that haven't been implemented yet.

The BCD436HP solved the simulcast issues that I was having with previous scanners, when monitoring Michigan's MSPCS. The other new features are great!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:22 AM
N2MWE's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: People's Republic of New York
Posts: 1,854
Default

Glad you wrote that about the MSpCS as I will be driving from New York to Wisconsin in a week and stopping in mackinaw city. The pro 197 had a hard time with MSP. My 536 gets the real test next week.
__________________
Sic vis pacem, para bellum...
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:31 AM
mciupa's Avatar
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,867
Default

Always
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:41 AM
mrkelso's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NNJ
Posts: 1,058
Default

Yes but not when they first come out. Never again after the last 2. I waited until last month to purchase my Homepatrol (an absolutely wonderful scanner) since the last beta firmware. SO if uniden comes up with a new model i will wait it out.

Next on my list will be one of the new whistlers but i will wait for a while once they come out.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2014, 11:31 AM
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 245
Default

I own the 536hp.Here in Pinellas County FL my 996xt suffered from simulcast issues on the county 800 system. No longer a problem with the 536hp crystal clear. No motor boating in the ear jack on digital decode either.
I do 800mhz system dxing here using a large 800 MHz Yagi ant.Here in FL we often have skip conditions via temperature inversions and tropo. With the 536hp and the full data base this is real easy to do. Simply punch in the distant areas zip code and it loads the systems into the scanner. Cant do that with the 996xt.

I really like the favorites list ability as well. No mater how I program my 996xt I find the 536hp is hearing more do its versatility in data setup.

The priority scan ability on both conv and trunked systems is better than the 996xt and the hp1 I have doesn't have it at all.
Setting a priority talk group on the 536hp is great and works vary well.

All and all the 536hp is the best scanner I have ever owned and I have about 20 scanners.
Would I buy it again....absolutely!!!!
Tim
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions