Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners and Receivers Forums > Uniden Scanners


Uniden Scanners A forum for the discussion of all Uniden scanning radios and receivers.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 05:22 AM
kd7rto's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bountiful, Ut
Posts: 321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnewell View Post
Let's get back to a constructive discussion rather than BS.
I think this thread does serve a useful purpose. We are telling the industry that there is a demand for a professional grade communications receiver that will follow trunking. If Uniden is firm in it’s belief that such an item would not sell, then hopefully Icom is listening, and will invest in the licensing required so that they can offer trunking decode abilities in the model they introduce to replace the IC8500.
__________________
Utah, Nevada, Northern California, HF, my equipment

Happiness is a band opening - Betty Boop
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 08:27 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Nope.
I would bet that in every forum on every topic there are threads asking for products that would fail in the market.

This thread is no different.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 08:42 AM
DaveIN's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,443
Default

Icom has no interest in the trunking abilities on a receiver and barely even interested in selling receivers any longer, and other than trunking software with the Winradio nobody is even close. The closest thing to a trunking "capable" (dual) receiver with third party software is the IC-R2500 and it's going the way of the dodo. The next step is a service monitor at the cost of a luxury car.

As I see it there are only two players in the trunking scanner market and both companies are very close under the current price limit for features and performance. Let's see what the new BCD996XT and BCT15X are like.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2009, 01:35 AM
wayne_h's Avatar
Forums Manager
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Posts: 5,619
Send a message via AIM to wayne_h
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KE4ZNR View Post
then he needs to form coherent sentences.
You need to chill out; one dig was enough. Based on the poster's IP he's no where near the North American continent. So obviously english is not his first language.
__________________
-Wayne
Please contact me via email for a faster response.
Forum Rules and Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2009, 09:23 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mancow View Post
One thing I found interesting is that the 396XT exhibited no detectable EDACS end tone at all, nothing. There wasn't even the slightest blip, even with the weakest of signals. It was as solid as the Ericsson M-RK.
Same with the 346XT. Great scanner.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2009, 09:35 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 17
Default

I notice that my 346XT when sitting on my desk powered by its wall wart can have a distinct 60Hz buzz on top of the audio of my local VHF SmartZone system. My 396T, using the same wall wart, same antenna, and in exactly the same locations as the 346XT exhibits no buzz at all. I'm not sure if this is due to increased sensitivity of the 346XT, is a manufacturing defect, or is a design defect.

It's also worth noting that when I power my 346XT from the 12v car power supply and I'm monitoring VHF air I hear alternator whine when squelch is broken on the 346XT but not on the 396T. The same external antenna (MaxRad VHF with mag mount) was used in both cases.

Does anyone have similar findings with their XT radios?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
dynamic range, rf front end, selectivity, sensitivity

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Now that the BCD996XT and BCT15X have been announced DaveIN Uniden Scanners 6 05-07-2009 08:38 PM
Uniden Announces the BCD996XT and BCT15X blantonl Community Announcements and News 0 05-05-2009 08:50 AM
Uniden announces BCD996XT & BCT15X torontokris Uniden Scanners 1 05-04-2009 06:28 PM
ProScan is out with BCD396XT and BC346XT support ProScan Uniden Scanners 0 04-05-2009 12:04 PM
Announcing the BCD396XT and BC346XT Scanners UPMan Uniden Scanners 929 03-09-2009 09:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions