Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Air490
You can't really compare the IC-R20 with the BCD396T. They are designed with different end-users and requirements in mind.
|
This is very true.
Tom,
Also, one major thing to keep in mind is that LA is grossly oversaturated with RF. It's capitalism at its best.
With that in mind, you may want to post this in the CA forum, not to be be redundant, but to find out how others in that area are coping with the RF problem in the valley.
I feel a Uniden may be the wrong choice, simply because the receiver in my opinion ranks poor in intermod rejection/front end overload. Also ranks poor in adjacent channel selectivity. These problems will be compounded as soon as you want to "hear" more, i.e. hook up the little guy to either a good mobile or outside antenna. You will end up actually hearing less of the desired signal and more products of undesireable signals.
A lot of folks in LA are buying commercial radios (almost always single banded, i.e. VHF hi, UHF, etc.) because their receivers are tuned to a specific band and can better reject unwanted signals (still not PPERFECT in LA). Even products like the R-20 are at some point succeptible to overload/intermod problems, but they are much better receivers and will have a much larger capacity for resisting these problems than the Uniden.
However, the Icom products or commercial grade radios (at least w/o proper programming) cannot trunk or do digital. What does that mean? If Uniden was willing to make a GOOD recevier, they would would have access to a huge market, LA NY, other large metro areas. Heck, I live 40 miles away from Sacramento in the sticks and the one Uniden I have still gets overloaded (even with 152 paging filter), while my unfiltered Icom receiver and motorolas NEVER have experienced overload from any pagers. So I guess that means I would buy one too.
Ryan