RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners and Receivers Forums > Uniden Scanners

Uniden Scanners A forum for the discussion of all Uniden scanning radios and receivers.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #201 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2013, 5:59 PM
UPMan's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 7,008
Default

Server seems to have locked up at about the same time a line of storms moved through. I did a hard reset and all seems well, now.
__________________
Uniden Product Ninja
Who is UpMan and why doesn't he answer my email/phone call?
Professional Scanner Developer
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #202 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2013, 6:27 PM
kirk23's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pierrefonds Qc. (West Island Montreal)
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DannB View Post
I run it and all i get is a prompt to "repair or cancel" File ...my scanner is working fine without the update so i may just say screw it and forget the update....i cant get it to work....
exactly what WX5UIF is telling you...
after you have downloaded it and unzipped it to your desktop or file.. closed that file and GO to your PROGRAMS in your start menu and OPEN the BC VUP V3 file FROM THERE..

I was making the same mistake
__________________
Kirk
Pierrefonds Qc.

BCD-396XT......BCD-996XT.....PRO-96......BC-760XLT.....BC-200XLT
Reply With Quote
  #203 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2013, 6:48 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Flanders NJ ( Morris County)
Posts: 299
Default thats better now

ok got it now...thanks guys...i have done various updates in the past and never had issues, it always updated without issue..anywhooo all is good now...thanks for the help
Reply With Quote
  #204 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2013, 6:50 PM
PJH's Avatar
PJH PJH is online now
Thread Killer
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruser View Post
I agree with that statement 100%.

Serial ports have been around forever and are still widely used in industrial control and radio programming. Almost all commercial radios still use a conventional serial port for programming.
In my eyes, a true serial port is much more reliable that any USB port is going to be.
RS-232 is an industry standard that is going to be around for a long time.
What radios are you referring too? I've only seen USB ones lately...
__________________
If you have received a PM from me about a submission, kindly reply within 5 days with requested information or your submission may be rejected. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #205 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2013, 8:12 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. Louis County, MO
Posts: 1,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJH View Post
What radios are you referring too? I've only seen USB ones lately...
Most all.
Many will come with a USB cable but that cable may just be a usb to serial with some using standard serial port levels and many that use TTL levels.
Some newer radios do have the USB to Serial converter inside the radio. If you look at service info, you will see they still use a serial bus with many at TTL levels.
Take the PR400 and the mobile version for example. They use a serial connection but it is TTL level. The radios in my repeaters are TTL level serial at the mic plugs. I think those are CDM750's which are really just a pair of mobile radios. Sure, some new Motorola's will appear to be USB but if you look at the service info, you will find they convert it right back to serial at standard serial port voltages or TTL levels. That method does cut down on the confusion though as the adapter is internal in the radio so you don't need to purchase an external converter but it also adds cost as every radio must have the adapter parts internal. It's fairly cheap these days though.
Many Icom's are serial.
Many radios have funky looking connectors and come with an adapter that does plug into a USB port for programming but odds are, the adapter is nothing more than a usb to serial adapter with the correct plug on one end that fits the radio or the usb to serial conversion is done internally.

Some scanners (PSR800 and HP1 are two) do offer a USB interface but it is still serial inside the radio.
The GRE's like the 500 and 600 and all the GRE made RadioShack models that have the PC/IF port are TTL level serial and the XT and T series Uniden's are true serial levels at the ports but they use a connector that many think is USB. The mobile versions do still have a standard DB-9 on the rear as there is room for it.
Most everything today still converts usb back to standard or ttl level serial with newer models having that conversion done inside the radio.

I'm sure there are some models that convert USB to the i2c bus that is also a common communications bus found in today's electronics but I'd think that is rare. SATA is an example of a form of a modern serial bus but it is not even close to a standard serial bus like RS-232. If you were sending megabytes of programming info, I could see the use of a USB to other type bus but in reality, the amount of data exchanged for programming even today's complex digital radios is still a small amount of data that can be sent over a standard serial bus in a matter of seconds.
I also suspect some radios use an encrypted programming bus kind of like HDMI is so the data cannot be extracted if someone manages to install a breakout box for data sniffing. I'd bet some of the military stuff does that.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #206 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2013, 10:48 AM
UPMan's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 7,008
Default

As far as speed goes, since most of the data sent to the scanner needs to be processed by the scanner, the "packet handling time" actually is more of a determinant of the possible transfer speed. Try an experiment: program the scanner at 9600, 19200, etc and clock the difference in upload times (you'll find a point where despite the increase in bps, the time to transfer hardly changes).
__________________
Uniden Product Ninja
Who is UpMan and why doesn't he answer my email/phone call?
Professional Scanner Developer
Reply With Quote
  #207 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2013, 11:19 AM
N1SQB's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,892
Default 396XT not being recognized by updater.

Well, I have tried everything under the sun to get this upgrade to take and it will not! I have gone through 4 different USB-DB9 cables, changed my port settings, updated drivers, and the updater still says scanner is not communicating and it will not detect it. This is inspite of the fact that I can upload / download and program as well as virtually control the scanner without any problems. When I try to do an update on my 996XT, it tells me to "remove the batteries and plug the radio in while pressing lock out and 6", as if it were the 396XT. Go figure that! I have NO problems on my laptop whatsoever and I'm running windows 7 which has been extremely stable in the 2 years I have owned it. I have 3 versions of Uniden scanners, 2 BCT15X, 1-996XT and 1-396XT portable which have never given me any issues when I plug them into the laptop for programing, or virtual control. I cannot find a reason for this not working!

Manny
__________________
N1SQB Amateur Extra
The difference between men and boys, is the price they pay for toys...
BCD996XT, BCT15X,396XT,346XT,GRE-PSR 310,Grundig G3,ICOM IC-7000,Motorola CDM1550LS+VHF/UHF,HT-1250UHF

Last edited by N1SQB; 01-30-2013 at 11:22 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #208 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2013, 11:44 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UPMan View Post
Serial (RS232) is required in order for the scanner to be compatible with GPS input for location-based scanning.
Sure, but aren't there are many more users who program and update their scanners with software
than there are who use GPS functionality???? Making the only port RS232 to keep the GPS
users happy while the rest of us are tilting at the Prolific Driver windmill seems to me to be a poor
read of the customer base.
Reply With Quote
  #209 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2013, 11:57 AM
davidmc36's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South East Ontario
Posts: 1,763
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shanny19 View Post
Sure, but aren't there are many more users who program and update their scanners with software
than there are who use GPS functionality???? Making the only port RS232 to keep the GPS
users happy while the rest of us are tilting at the Prolific Driver windmill seems to me to be a poor
read of the customer base.
But there are perfectly simple solutions to make it talk to a computer with the RS232 connection, and if you made it USB only, the ones who do want to use GPS (one of the main reasons that I bought the scanner) would be out in the cold.

And I have never had any trouble making talk to a computer. Have used at least a dozen different Serial-USB adapters including Prolific Genuine, Prolific Pirated, and FTDI. They all work and are distributed throughout computers at home, work, and car.

So no, not a poor read of customer base, just the best solution to keep more than just one segment happy.
__________________
No Bounce, No Play.
The one who dies with the most toys wins
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
        
  #210 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2013, 12:09 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. Louis County, MO
Posts: 1,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shanny19 View Post
Sure, but aren't there are many more users who program and update their scanners with software
than there are who use GPS functionality???? Making the only port RS232 to keep the GPS
users happy while the rest of us are tilting at the Prolific Driver windmill seems to me to be a poor
read of the customer base.
The heck with Prolific based chpsets. Get FTDI, they work plain and simple.
Reply With Quote
  #211 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2013, 12:21 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. Louis County, MO
Posts: 1,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N1SQB View Post
Well, I have tried everything under the sun to get this upgrade to take and it will not! I have gone through 4 different USB-DB9 cables, changed my port settings, updated drivers, and the updater still says scanner is not communicating and it will not detect it. This is inspite of the fact that I can upload / download and program as well as virtually control the scanner without any problems. When I try to do an update on my 996XT, it tells me to "remove the batteries and plug the radio in while pressing lock out and 6", as if it were the 396XT. Go figure that! I have NO problems on my laptop whatsoever and I'm running windows 7 which has been extremely stable in the 2 years I have owned it. I have 3 versions of Uniden scanners, 2 BCT15X, 1-996XT and 1-396XT portable which have never given me any issues when I plug them into the laptop for programing, or virtual control. I cannot find a reason for this not working!

Manny
See if you can find the commands that enable Device Manager to show all hidden devices.
You can write a simple batch file or set permanent set statements in your profile with the commands needed.

Then click to show all devices and look under Ports as well as Universal Serial Bus Controllers section and get rid of any USB to Serial adapters that are not being used plus maybe get rid of the current ones that are working as well. Pay attention for a box that you can select that says something like "Remove All drivers" and that will also remove the drivers so they are reinstalled.

This method allows you to get rid of what is called "Ghost Devices".

Here are the commands, copy and paste them into Notepad and save the file to your desktop as "Hidden Devices.bat". Right click on the new batch file and run as administrator otherwise it still may not show all hidden devices. When Device Manager opens, you must still go to the menus at the top and select to show hidden devices. Be careful as there are things that can be removed this way that can make your system unbootable! Stay out of the Network section unless you are removing a ghost NIC and also stay out of the Non Plug&Play section.
The stuff under Ports or USB are safe to remove as they will be reinstalled. Remember to check the box to also remove the drivers if the box is present. If the drivers have already been removed, that checkbox will not appear.

Here are the commands:

set devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices=1
set devmgr_show_details=1
start devmgmt.msc

You can also set those in your profile's environment variables so you don't need to run the batch file each time but I find running the batch file just as simple.
Reply With Quote
  #212 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2013, 6:08 PM
rmosier's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mt. Olive,NJ
Posts: 238
Default

It's been a couple of weeks since I applied this update. I monitor Morris County NJ and since the update all P25 transmissioins sound worse. I started out at the default settings of 8 and 50 and I've tried many different values. My BCD396T receives very well with settings of Manual and 7. Any idea what that would equate to on the XT?
__________________
Mt. Olive (Morris County), NJ
Bearcat IV, AR1000, AR8200 MK1 EU (Non-Blocked), BCD396T & BCD396XT
Reply With Quote
  #213 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2013, 8:54 PM
scanningisfun's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 560
Send a message via MSN to scanningisfun
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmosier View Post
It's been a couple of weeks since I applied this update. I monitor Morris County NJ and since the update all P25 transmissioins sound worse. I started out at the default settings of 8 and 50 and I've tried many different values. My BCD396T receives very well with settings of Manual and 7. Any idea what that would equate to on the XT?
The actual default settings for the 396XT are:
-P25 Mode set to 3
-P25 Level set to 50

It seems that the 1.10.00 firmware has caused confusion to what the true defaults are. The P25 Mode was recommended to be set to 11 after that update. The actual default is 3. I'm not saying 3 is better than 11, as 11 may work great. Anything below 8 seems to act like 3.

Jacob
Reply With Quote
  #214 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2013, 11:31 PM
sfdf's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Healdsburg, CA
Posts: 375
Default

Check under Device Mgr. what Com port your Cable is working.
Run BC_VUP_V3 from the directory it was installed in.
Run it without connecting your Scanner first and you will get an error saying connect you Scanner..
After that you get an Box with the option to select your Com or Auto dect it. connect your Scanner and double check to see if the Com Port is still the same
Make sure you uninstall old Installer first.
"update on my 996XT, it tells me to "remove the batteries and plug the radio in while pressing lock out and 6"," It should not do that with the new updater. make sure you UNINSTALL the old one

Quote:
Originally Posted by N1SQB View Post
Well, I have tried everything under the sun to get this upgrade to take and it will not! I have gone through 4 different USB-DB9 cables, changed my port settings, updated drivers, and the updater still says scanner is not communicating and it will not detect it. This is inspite of the fact that I can upload / download and program as well as virtually control the scanner without any problems. When I try to do an update on my 996XT, it tells me to "remove the batteries and plug the radio in while pressing lock out and 6", as if it were the 396XT. Go figure that! I have NO problems on my laptop whatsoever and I'm running windows 7 which has been extremely stable in the 2 years I have owned it. I have 3 versions of Uniden scanners, 2 BCT15X, 1-996XT and 1-396XT portable which have never given me any issues when I plug them into the laptop for programing, or virtual control. I cannot find a reason for this not working!

Manny

Last edited by sfdf; 01-30-2013 at 11:48 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #215 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2013, 5:25 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 53
Default 1.11 Update makes scanner unusable (on SD RCS)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anderegg View Post
Thank you fx! I rolled back to 1.10.0 and now my scanner is back to normal. No motorboating, no 1-3 second static bursts, works just as it did before the evil 1.11.0. When the scanner did decode with the new firmware on my simulcast systems, it DID NOT improve the broken and choppy digital reception at full signal.

Paul
Thank you Anderegg! I had the same problems on the SD RCS: motorboating, garbled voice. Tried every combination of the p25 settings .

Reverted and all is better!!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #216 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2013, 7:58 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 292
Default

Thank fx David!

Also, this is the reason I WILL NOT be updating my 996XT's to the new simulcast firmware......I learned my lesson.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #217 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2013, 8:29 AM
FDNY10-75's Avatar
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 110
Send a message via AIM to FDNY10-75
Default

Since I've applied this update to the 396XT and my HP-1 I have been having an issue with both conventional and trunked transmissions dropping out in the middle as if the unit or dispatcher had stopped transmitting (which is not the case).

Anyone else having this problem?
__________________
http://www.10-75.Net
Reply With Quote
  #218 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2013, 9:06 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. Louis County, MO
Posts: 1,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FDNY10-75 View Post
Since I've applied this update to the 396XT and my HP-1 I have been having an issue with both conventional and trunked transmissions dropping out in the middle as if the unit or dispatcher had stopped transmitting (which is not the case).

Anyone else having this problem?
Sounds almost like you may have enabled a priority of some type or a close call scan that is interrupting your regular signals.
Odd that you are seeing it on both models though.
Reply With Quote
  #219 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2013, 10:17 AM
FDNY10-75's Avatar
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 110
Send a message via AIM to FDNY10-75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kruser View Post
Sounds almost like you may have enabled a priority of some type or a close call scan that is interrupting your regular signals.
Odd that you are seeing it on both models though.
Thats exactly what it sounds like/how it's acting but CC, weather pri and priority are all disabled.
__________________
http://www.10-75.Net
Reply With Quote
  #220 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2013, 12:50 PM
Highpockets's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toms River, New Jersey
Posts: 3,709
Send a message via AIM to Highpockets
Default

UPMan,

Can you at least let the users know if the last update for the 396/996XT will stand as is, or are you taking a second look at the update that fixed the LSM problems. Seems like some users are going back to the update before this one, and I thinking I may also, but if a second look is in the works, I'd just stay with this update and wait it out if something may replace it. No need for a date and time, just if a second look is in the works.
__________________
Steve
BC785D ~ BCD396XT ~ BCD996XT ~ PSR600
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions