RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners and Receivers Forums > Uniden Forums > The Uniden Tavern

The Uniden Tavern For general chit-chat and non-technical discussion specific to Uniden and does not fall within the above forum topics. This is not the forum to get technical advice from.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2014, 11:30 PM
t_shuffle's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fair Oaks, CA
Posts: 86
Default Anyone else think the all sub-forum layout sucks?

Sub-forums most certainly have their place, but this new setup just seems sort of ridiculous to me.

Browsing the forums has lost a lot of it's appeal; too many places to look to see what's going on, and then trying to figure out which sub would be the right one to post your thought or question where it will actually been seen by like-minded folks.

I think that besides putting it back the way it was, a much better layout would be to break it down by scanner model.
__________________
Wanted: Scan button for my HP-1. Willing to trade Atten button in like-new condition.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2014, 11:49 PM
sfdf's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Healdsburg, CA
Posts: 541
Default

NO.
It resemble how the California Forum is set up.
Second I can See what has changed since I last looked at it..... If I remember when I last looked at it or when it notify me through my email.
In this specific Forum I have 4 Taps open. 3 I''m most interested in Monitoring and the 4th is just Uniden and I can See what has changed and check it out.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 12:15 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 708
Default

In case it helps make it easier to display things in a one-list style, this other thread explains how to set-up a custom "New Posts" and "Daily" updates-list, and uses the new Uniden sub-threads as an example.

Forums Administration : Uniden Forum Reordered - Question

Hope this helps,
__________________
73 QDP
[106/2SRA]
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 12:16 AM
JoeyC's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,992
Default

NO.
Any time a forum gets as crowded as the Uniden forum has gotten, it becomes more difficult to find information you are looking for. It was about time a reorganization occurred.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 12:39 AM
t_shuffle's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fair Oaks, CA
Posts: 86
Default

If we're going to do it this way, don't you think a model specific layout would be much more useful and relevant?
__________________
Wanted: Scan button for my HP-1. Willing to trade Atten button in like-new condition.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 12:55 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t_shuffle View Post
If we're going to do it this way, don't you think a model specific layout would be much more useful and relevant?
I understand your question. I think Admins are hoping the "Prefix" feature (explained in this thread) will allow the "Advanced Search" feature to more easily limit searches to a specific model.

If that doesn't work as intended, then organizing sub-forums by model might be necessary.
If the prefixes do make the search sufficiently effective, then the current discussion-topic based subforums can be navigated either way.
__________________
73 QDP
[106/2SRA]

Last edited by QDP2012; 03-11-2014 at 1:03 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 8:18 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 127
Default

Yeah, it does suck. It's not that the idea of dividing forums up is inherently bad, it's the way they divided them up in this case. They are not divided in a way that easily lends itself to following things or figuring out where to post something when you have a question.

For instance, let's say I have a 436hp and I'm having difficulties with a quick key setup. Do I post it in bugs, software discussion, performance or tech support? It could be any of those four. If it gets moved then I have to chase it down to figure out which forum the admins thought was appropriate. Or maybe after a bit of group discussion it migrates to being an actual bug. Does the entire discussion thread then move to the "bugs" subforum or does it stay in the original forum? Or let's say I'm interested in following threads about performance issues. I can't just follow the "performance" thread because it could be a bug or a software issue.

That's the problem. The categories for the subforums are not unique enough to contain even the simplest of issues in one forum. So you're always guessing and you end up having to follow a half a dozen different forums.

A more logical layout would be more model-specific as t_shuffle suggested with maybe a couple of others. Something like:
- 436/536/HP
- Sentinel software (maybe make this a subforum of 436/536/HP since it only applies to them)
- Older trunking (396xt, 996xt)
- Older non-trunking (330t, etc.)
- General gripes, rants, feature requests, new user questions (similar to the "tavern")

Much clearer because then you can follow the forums involving your specific scanner/model while segmenting out the stuff that you might not care about...i.e. I could care less about 18x problems but others might and they can follow the older non-trunking forum. The non-pertinent or immediately useful information gets put in the "tavern"-like "General" forum.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 8:32 AM
n4yek's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newport, Tennessee
Posts: 1,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t_shuffle View Post
If we're going to do it this way, don't you think a model specific layout would be much more useful and relevant?
That was my thought also, evertime a new model comes out the forum gets over-run by questions. In a few years it will slow down again.
__________________
Danny Harp Jr.
HAM Radio Operator: N4YEK
A blood donor saved my life (Matthew 26:28).....Remember, Jesus loves you.
If 'con' is opposite of 'pro', is Congress the opposite of progress?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 8:33 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,073
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveharpe View Post
Yeah, it does suck. ....
A more logical layout would be more model-specific as t_shuffle suggested with maybe a couple of others. Something like:
- 436/536/HP
- Sentinel software (maybe make this a subforum of 436/536/HP since it only applies to them)
- Older trunking (396xt, 996xt)
- Older non-trunking (330t, etc.)
- General gripes, rants, feature requests, new user questions (similar to the "tavern")

....
I agree with this.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 8:56 AM
mrkelso's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NNJ
Posts: 994
Default

It's all very confusing and now we have a lot of threads being moved. I don't like it is my vote.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 9:15 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveharpe View Post
A more logical layout would be more model-specific as t_shuffle suggested with maybe a couple of others. Something like:
- 436/536/HP
- Sentinel software (maybe make this a subforum of 436/536/HP since it only applies to them)
- Older trunking (396xt, 996xt)
- Older non-trunking (330t, etc.)
- General gripes, rants, feature requests, new user questions (similar to the "tavern")

Much clearer because then you can follow the forums involving your specific scanner/model while segmenting out the stuff that you might not care about...i.e. I could care less about 18x problems but others might and they can follow the older non-trunking forum. The non-pertinent or immediately useful information gets put in the "tavern"-like "General" forum.
With the above suggestion in mind, maybe a combination of it and the current structure should be considered? ...something like:

-- 436/536/HP
---- Sentinel Software
---- Owner Tech Support
---- Prospective Owners
---- Performance and Technical Topics
---- Bug Reports
-- Older Trunking
---- Owner Tech Support
---- Prospective Owners
---- Performance and Technical Topics
---- Bug Reports
-- Older Non-Trunking
---- Owner Tech Support
---- Prospective Owners
---- Performance and Technical Topics
---- Bug Reports
-- Uniden Future Designs (what I want in next Uniden model)
-- General Uniden Discussion (general topics, but not rants)

Something like this would help organize first by model, and then by topic within each model, making it easier (hopefully) to find items of interest without wading through many items of disinterest.

It would also allow custom "New Post" and "Today" lists/searches to be created for specific models, etc., and/or for things like "all uniden bug reports", etc.

This concept could extend to the GRE/Whistler forum(s) with similar benefits.

Just a thought,
__________________
73 QDP
[106/2SRA]
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 9:40 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5
Default

Some of us may not like it (myself included) but I think it's just a matter of getting used to it. It's a big (sudden) change to the Uniden section and once we get used to it, I'm sure our opinions will change.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 9:59 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ZZV - Ohio
Posts: 643
Default

I see so many posts by those that are "internet challenged" and that I'm sure it just makes it worse.

Of course I see so many posts by those with reading comprehension issues as well as , oh hell with it - just plain STUPID that can't operate a scanner anyway or fail to RTFM.

Personally - I don't like it as it takes a little longer to find the new posts. As stated previously, in a few months it will dwindle and no one will see the info. and no one will ever answer the post.
__________________
HP-1 x2 , BC780, BCD996, Pro 2005, 2006, AT803,R5000
and other RF capture devices
-Remember Bill Cheek -

Last edited by phask; 03-11-2014 at 10:18 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 10:45 AM
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fremont NE
Posts: 1,040
Default

Yes! I liked having 1 go-to place for uniden discussion. Now that I have to navigate through 7, I find myself not reading as much. Maybe trim it down from 7 to 3-4... Dave's suggestion above is perfect IMO.
__________________
Uniden BCD396XT, BCD396T, BC125AT, BC700A, Radio Shack Pro-83, Motorola HT1000, (3) Motorola JT1000
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 5:36 PM
Nightjock's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rochester/Victor, NY
Posts: 80
Default

If you hate it, bookmark this: http://forums.radioreference.com/sea...new&forumid=82
__________________
Uniden BCD 536HP, Uniden BCD 396XT, Uniden Bearcat 210XLT, Worldstar MG-6000, Baofeng UV-B5
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 7:52 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by QDP2012 View Post
With the above suggestion in mind, maybe a combination of it and the current structure should be considered? ...something like:
I see what you're thinking on this but I think the goal should be to have fewer places not more. The subdivisions you're mentioning would mean each one of those individual subforums would only have maybe one or two posts per day...which is a pain to check for each time. Good thoughts though...
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 9:14 PM
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fremont NE
Posts: 1,040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightjock View Post
that doesnt help me. its only showing 14 posts..? i know theres more then that in the entire uniden section...
__________________
Uniden BCD396XT, BCD396T, BC125AT, BC700A, Radio Shack Pro-83, Motorola HT1000, (3) Motorola JT1000
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2014, 10:53 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SquierStrat View Post
that doesnt help me. its only showing 14 posts..? i know theres more then that in the entire uniden section...
Here is the link to the "GetDaily" instead of the "GetNew" search, but is still filtered to the Uniden forum. (Click on the word "Code", or copy-paste the URL into your browser.)

Code:
http://forums.radioreference.com/search.php?do=getdaily&forumid=82
Hope this helps,
__________________
73 QDP
[106/2SRA]
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2014, 8:13 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Terre Haute IN
Posts: 103
Default

I've pretty much quit reading the forums because of this change, as I now have to browse 7 different sub groups to read the latest Uniden posts.

So Yes, the new grouping is terrible.
__________________
WA9SDJ
536HP, 996XT, BC9000XLT, PSR-800
HiQSDR, Elecraft KX3, Yaesu FT-950, FTM-350AR, FT-8800R, FT-1802
TH-72A, Icom T7H, RS Pro 83, Uniden Washington
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2014, 9:17 AM
Jay911's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bragg Creek, Alberta
Posts: 6,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drdiesel1 View Post
I've pretty much quit reading the forums because of this change, as I now have to browse 7 different sub groups to read the latest Uniden posts.

So Yes, the new grouping is terrible.
Clicking "New Posts" doesn't work? It works here.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions